Samenvatting

Gedetailleerde samenvatting van Beleid 2: Multi-level governance, artikelen + hoorcolleges

1 keer verkocht

Vak
BBO II

Instelling
Universiteit Leiden (UL)

Gedetailleerde samenvatting van Beleid 2: Multi-level governance van iemand die alles goed bijhoudt en het vak met een 9,5 heeft afgerond! De hoorcolleges én artikelen zijn verwerkt

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 118 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 8 april 2024
Aantal pagina's 118
Geschreven in 2022/2023
Type Samenvatting

€7,56

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Samenvatting BBO II

Inhoudsopgave
Hoorcollege 1; wat is multi-level governance? ................................................................................................. 2
Hooghe & Marks: Unraveling the Centra; State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance....................... 2
Piattonsi: Multi-level governance; a Historical and Conceptual Analysis ..................................................... 8
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 14

Hoorcollege 2; de uitdagingen van de overheid anno 21e eeuw, van government naar governance .............. 22
Peters & Pierre: Governance Without Government? .................................................................................. 22
Gjaltema et al.: From government to governance … to meta-governance ................................................. 33
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 44

Hoorcollege 3; Veranderingen verticaal bestuur: veranderende rol voor de Nederlandse lokale overheid &
Multi-level governance ook “good governance” ............................................................................................ 50
Agranoff: Local Governments in Multileven Systems: Emergent Public Administration Challenges ........... 50
Fraanje & Herweijer: innoveren in samenwerking: een alternatief voor herindeling? ............................... 59
Mostert: Who should do what in environmental management? ................................................................ 69
Breeman & Van Eijk: Samenwerkend bestuur; bestuurlijke kaart van Nederland ...................................... 75
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 76

Hoorcollege 4; Veranderingen horizontaal bestuur: veranderende rol van private actoren & Impact op de
overheid als publieke organisatie ................................................................................................................... 85
O’Leary & Vij: Collaborative Public Management ...................................................................................... 85
Van Eijk & Steen” The public encounter and the role of citizens ................................................................. 96
Breeman & Van Eijk: Samenwerkend bestuur; bestuurlijke kaart van Nederland .................................... 109
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................. 109

,Hoorcollege 1; wat is multi-level governance?

Hooghe & Marks: Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level
Governance
• Modern governance is, and should be, dispersed across multiple centers of authority;
but how should multi-level governance be organized? What are the basis
alternatives?

• The article states that the diffusion of decision making away from the central state
rase fundamental issues of design that can be conceptualized as 2 contrasting types
of governance
− Types are logically coherent + represent alternative responses to fundamental
problems of coordination

• The study of local government in the US + Western Europe bears directly on multi-
level, polycentric governance

• An influential starting point: Tiebout’s 1956 article
− Established the claim that competition among multiple local jurisdictions
leads to more efficient provision of local public services

• The literatures share the idea that dispersion of governance across multiple
jurisdictions is more flexible than concertation of governance in one jurisdiction
− Efficient governance adjusts jurisdictions to the trade-off between the virtues
+ vices of centralization

− Large jurisdictions are good because
- They have the virtue of exploiting economies of scale in the provision
of public goods
- Internalizing policy externalities, allowing for more efficient taxation
- Facilitating more efficient redistribution
- Enlarging the territorial scope of security and market exchange

− Large jurisdictions are bad when
- They impose a single policy on diverse ecological systems/territorially
heterogeneous populations

• Criticism of centralized government: It is insensitive to varying scale efficiencies from
policy to policy
− Economies of scale are more likely to characterize the production of capital-
intensive public goods, instead of labor-intensive services because economies
accrue from spreading costs over larger outputs

• There is consensus that flexible governance must be multi-level, but there is no
consensus about how MLG should be structured
 There are 2 types

,Type 1
• Type I: Describes jurisdictions at limited number of levels which are general purpose;
they bundle together multiple functions, including a range of policy responsibilities +
court system + representative institutions
− Type I: beschrijft jurisdicties op een beperkt aantal niveaus die algemeen
bedoeld zijn; ze bundelen meerdere functies, waaronder een reeks
beleidsverantwoordelijkheden + rechtssysteem + representatieve instellingen

• Some characteristics:
− Describes jurisdictions at limited number of levels

− The jurisdictions (international, national, regional, meso, local) are general-
purpose
− They bundle together multiple functions, including policy responsibilities +
court system + representation institutions

− Membership boundaries don’t intersect

− Every citizen is located in a Russian Doll set of nested jurisdictions where
there is one and only relevant jurisdiction at any particular territorial scale
− Territorial jurisdictions are stable for periods of several decades
− Allocation of policy competencies across jurisdictional levels are flexible

• Intellectual foundation: Federalism
− Federalism is concerned with power sharing among limited number of
governments operating at a few levels + relationship between central
government and nonintersecting subnational governments

• Framework is systemwide, functions are bundles, levels of government are multiple
but limited in number

, • Characteristics
− General-purpose jurisdictions
- Decision making powers dispersed across jurisdictions, but bundled in
small number of packages
- Emphasize costs of decomposing authority into disparate packages
- Idea is strong in Europe, where local government usually eercises wide
spread of functions, reflecting the the concept of general-purpose
local authorities exercising comprehensive care for their communities”
(Norton 1991, 22)

− Nonintersecting Memberships
- Durable boundaries that are nonintersecting at any particular level
- Memberships of jurisdictions are higher + lower tiers don’t intersect

− Limited Number of Jurisdictional Levels
- Type I organizes jurisdictions at just a few levels
- It is common to distinguish local, intermediate, and central level

− Systemwide, Durable Architecture
- Systemic institutional choice
- Type I usually adopt the trias politicas structure in modern
democracies

- Type I are durable; jurisdictional reform is costly + unusual
- Institutions responsible for governance are sticky + tend to outlive
conditions that brought them into being

Type 2
• Type II: Composed of specialized jurisdictions, fragmented into functionally specific
pieces

• Some characteristics
− Composed of specialized jurisdictions
− Fragmented into functionally specific pieces
− Number of such jurisdictions is potentially huge + scale they operate vary
finely
− No great fixity in their existence
− Tend to be lean + flexible; they come and go as demands for governance
change

• Number of jurisdictions is potentially vast, rather than limited
• Don’t operate on just a few levels, but operate at numerous territorial scales
• Task specific, rather than general-purpose

• Conception is predominant among neoclassical economists + public choice theorists

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper isadruijts. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,56. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis