Samenvatting
Summary Philosophy of the Humanities
- Instelling
- Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
Philosophy of the Humanities exam notes
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
NOTES PHILOSOPHY EXAMWeek 1:
Lecture:
What is philosophy of science?
• General philo of science vs. Specific philo of science
o General: issues and questions that transcend specific disciplines
o Specific: issues specific to a particular scientific discipline
• Different kinds of philosophical theory of sc
o Logical theory of sc
▪ Structure of sc theories and the relationship between theory and evidence
▪ Methodology of sc
• Rules & procedures that sctists do or should follow
▪ Understanding sc thinking
▪ Understanding sc change
• Descriptive and normative philosophies
o Descriptive claims about sc
o Normative claims about sc
o Often descriptive and normative philo become intertwined
▪ A theory of explanation should show us how sc explanation advances our understanding
▪ An account of explanation ought to enable us to comprehend and to arbitrate disputes in
past and present sc
• Rudolf Carnap - Explication
o Says that sc often use explications
o Ex : replacing concept fish with sc concept Piscis
▪ = specifying terms to mean something more specific
o Says that philosophers should use explications just like sctists do
• Science vs pseudo sc
o Sc = an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and
predictions about the world
o Pseudosc= is a claim, belief or practice which is presented as sc but lacks the valid sc methodology
or supporting evidence
o Verifiability
▪ Claim should be testable using sensory experience
o Falsifiability
▪ Claim should have the potential to be refuted by some possible observation
• Demarcating sc from pseudo sc
o Logical positivism : verifiability
▪ Claim should be testable using sensory experience
o Karl Popper: falsifiability
▪ Claim should have the potential to be refuted by some possible observation
• Logical Positivism
o Verifiability theory of meaning
▪ Verifiability = testability
▪ Knowing the meaning of a sentence is knowing how to verify it by means of observation
▪ Experience only source of meaning
, ▪ Sc claims are verifiable = have meaning
▪ Traditional philo lacks meaning
o The Vienna Circle = Logical positivists
▪ Robert Carnap
▪ Moritz Schlick
▪ Otto Neurath
▪ Herbert Feigl
▪ Hans Reichenbach
▪ Ludwig Wittgenstein
▪ Carl G. Hempel
• Problems with verifiability
o The criterion itself is not verifiable
o The neutral experience assumption is false
▪ Observation is theory-laden = you always have your own view / opinion on things
• Karl Popper
o Verifiability theory does not work
o Popper’s alternative: falsifiability
▪ Claims should have the potential to be refuted by some possible observation
▪ Claims need to forbid certain states of affairs
▪ Observation is theory laden
• Problems with falsifiability
o Does not square with sc practice
▪ Sctistss don’t abandon their theories after one falsification
o Pseudo sc can make falsifiable statements
o Probabilistic claims
▪ Spotting wolf in Amsterdamse bos = low probability even but not completely impossible
• Popper’s reproduction requirement
o Non-reproducible single occurrences are of no significance to sc
• Reproduction and replication
o Reproduction = experiment y repeats experiment x ; x and y have the same design; and results of
y confirms x’s results
▪ Problem with non reproducibility in psychology
o Replication = experiment y repeats experiment x ; x and y have a different design, the results of y
confirm x’s results
• Goals of sc
o Realism
o Constructive empiricism
o Accurate descriptions of the observable parts of the world
• (Wide) pragmatism
o Kitcher
o Hempel
o Practically significant truths
▪ Applying the knowledge will contribute to human welfare
o Episthemically significant truths
▪ Certain things which it is good to know for human beings because it will relieve their
curiosity
• Causal relations
o = potentiablly exploitable for purposes of manipulation and control
, • Explanation vs. interpretation
o Natural sc: causality and (nomological) explanation
▪ Erklaren
▪ Methods for causal explanation
o Humanities: interpretation
▪ Verstehen
▪ Methods for interpretation
Workgroup:
Plato & the Allegory of the Cave
Basics:
• Onderdeel van boek VII (7) uit Plato’s Republic
• Hoofdpersonen
o Socrates: leraar Plato
o Glaucon: broer Plato
• Geschreven ongeveer 380 BC
SPA: Socrates → Plato → Aristoteles
• Cave wall as a sort of proto-cinema
Plato & Aristoteles
• Plato: dialogue → understanding & interpreting through dialogue
• Opening yourself up for someone else’s ideas through conversation (think about the cave)
• Aristoteles: praxis → practical uses of philosophy & ethics
Week 2:
Lecture:
Logical positivism: historical context
• Turn of 20th century natural sc flourished (Einstein’s relativity theory)
• Sc as the right model for philo
• Main aim of logical positivism: analysis of the nature, success, and growth of sc knowledge
• Logical reconstructions of sc results (theories, explanations)
o Context of discovery vs. context of justification
• Vienna Circle “Reflective epicenter”
• Verifiability theory of meaning
o Knowing the meaning of a sentence is knowing how to verify it by means of observation
o Verifiability = testability
o Strong empiricist principle: experience is the only source of meaning
o Sc claims are verifiable and hence have meaning seeing as most traditional philo lacks
meaning
The unified sc ideal
, • Unified science: single uniform (observation) language across the sc (including humanities)
• Aim of sc: explanations as answers to why questions
o Covering law explanations
o Variety: deductive nomological explanation
o Monism: only bona fide explanations in natural, social and human sc are covering law
explanations
• Deductive nomological explanation
o Conditions for successful explanation
▪ Deductive component
▪ Nomological component
Verifiability and the problem of induction
• The problem of induction
o Universal laws resist verification and confirmation
• Covering law explanation requires universal laws
o Popper says this is impossible due to induction problem
▪ It is logically impossible to verify every instance covered by the law
▪ In principle always possible that the law will be refuted by future observations
▪ So confirmation is also no solution
• Popper’s alternative
o Like logical positivism, popper wants to capture the nature and growth of sc knowledge
o His alternative is critical rationalism
▪ Justification of induction is impossible: all knowledge is hypothetical
▪ Growth of sc knowledge can be captured by means of falsifiability and
hypothetico-deductive methor
▪ Completely different take on the method of sc and on the demarcation of sc from
pseudo sc
Karl Popper’s critical Rationalism
• Verifiability theory does not work
• His alternative: falsifiability
o Claim should have the potential to be refuted by some possible observation
o Claim need to forbid certain states of affairs
o Observation is theory-laden
• Knowledge is not founded on observation, but can be corrected in the light of observation
• Testing theories by the means of basic sentences
o These are theory-laden
o Their acceptane in the testing of theories is based on convention/agreement
• Verification and confirmation are conservative
• Hypotheses should be risky
Problems with falsifiability
• Does not square with sc practice
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper glitterfi. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75323 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen