100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Cognitive Behavior Interventions (CBI) - Full Compact Course Summary (Lecture & Literature) €5,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Cognitive Behavior Interventions (CBI) - Full Compact Course Summary (Lecture & Literature)

1 beoordeling
 41 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht

Very compact (yet complete) notes for the course exam of Cognitive Behavior Interventions (CBI). Includes all the material from the literature and 4 lectures (specified on the left margin). It also includes essential tables and figures of models to help visualizing them! To help reading speed, ...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 3 van de 23  pagina's

  • Nee
  • 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14
  • 19 juni 2024
  • 23
  • 2023/2024
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: lauracerise • 7 uur geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: yasminbosquetti • 5 uur geleden

Thank you for the review, glad to hear you are satisfied! Good luck with the exam!

avatar-seller
yasminbosquetti
‭MSc Clinical Psychology - Leiden University‬
‭2024‬
‭ ognitive Behavioral Interventions - Notes‬
C
‭Main Topics‬ ‭Notes: Lec & Exam‬

‭ h 4. Exposure therapy:‬
C -‭ exposure therapy is not a mechanism, it's a procedure; used in CBT to reduce pathological fear and related‬
‭promoting emotional‬ ‭emotions‬
‭processing of‬ ‭- anxiety disorders = when safe stimuli acquires a meaning of danger and elicits irrational fear and‬
‭pathological anxiety‬ ‭avoidance‬
‭Basic Foundations‬ ‭- learning principles as used to understand pathological anxiety‬
‭classical conditioning‬ ‭- previously neutral CS (dog) acquires meaning through association with US (bite) → evokes automatic UR‬
‭(fear); forms CS → UR‬
‭- is‬‭pathological‬‭when CS is not in itself dangerous‬‭→ treated with extinction (repeat CS without US) or‬
‭counter conditioning (repeat CS with pleasant US)‬
‭- avoidance is reinforced via drop in physiological arousal; prevents the individual from learning that CS‬
‭does not entirely predict harm (CS-no US), impedes extinction!‬
‭- fear is originally learned through classical conditioning and maintained through‬‭operant conditioning‬
‭- therapy = a) extinction through confrontation with CS + b) elimination of avoidance‬
‭emotional processing‬ ‭- there is a‬‭fear network‬‭= structure for escaping‬‭or avoiding danger; representation of feared stimuli,‬
‭theory‬ ‭responses, and meaning of stimuli and responses → activated by input matching the info stored‬
‭- fear structure becomes‬‭pathological‬‭= associations‬‭among stimulus, response, and meaning do not reflect‬
‭reality (stimulus is not actually dangerous)‬
‭-‬‭emotional processing‬‭=‬‭correcting*‬‭the structure,‬‭which leads to fear reduction‬
‭- emotional processing occurs under 2 conditions: (1) the fear structure must be activated; (2) new‬
‭incompatible info must be incorporated into the pathological memory structure/ form a new one)‬
‭- *NOTE: actually, pathological structure cannot be modified, exposure therapy only forms‬‭a new competing‬
‭structure‬‭(see inhibitory learning theory)‬
‭- overlap with CBT = changes in erroneous cognitions is also a primary therapy goal‬
‭Empirical Evidence‬ ‭- phobias: fear structure has erroneous info about feared object/ situation, e.g., exaggerated estimation of‬
‭probability of harm → disconfirm negative expectations; no apparent advantage in adding cognitive therapy‬
‭- panic disorder: when physical sensations, panic, and anxiety are considered dangerous (indicators of‬
‭catastrophes e.g., heart attack, going crazy) → goal is to confront feared bodily sensations, in vivo;‬
‭medication may interfere (prevent inhibitory learning)‬
‭- SAD: worry about being judged and criticized, perceived as incompetent because of apparent anxiety →‬
‭role-plays, in vivo; make specific predictions for objective evaluation; exposure is critical in CBT for SAD‬
‭- GAD: exaggerations in a sense of harm, due to low tolerance for uncertainty, perceiving worry as positive‬
‭coping; worry is negatively reinforced (decrease in emotional distress) but prevents emotional processing in‬
‭the long-term; avoidance of situations associated with exaggerated sense of danger (e.g., new uncertain‬
‭experiences); no clear phobic target, limited success‬
‭- OCD: exaggerated or unrealistic estimates of threat and belief that compulsions are the needed to reduce‬
‭anxiety → exposure to feared stimuli and abstinence from rituals →‬‭disconfirmation‬‭of the expected harm‬

‭ ‬‭emotional processing‬‭; large effectiveness‬
‭- PTSD: avoidance of trauma-related thoughts, situations → prolonged exposure therapy (PE) has most‬
‭evidence → emotional processing‬
‭- PE = expose to trauma reminders and memories (avoidance maintains the beliefs about themselves and the‬
‭world); imaginal exposure (because even remembering is perceived as dangerous; but not under- or‬
‭over-engaged!) → processing immediately after, encourage explicit insights to facilitate emotional processing‬
‭Research and Unresolved‬ ‭- fear response to CS may return when: US is presented without CS (‬‭reinstatement‬‭); CS is presented‬
‭Issues‬ ‭outside the place of extinction (‬‭renewal‬‭); spontaneously‬‭(‬‭spontaneous recovery‬‭)‬
‭- avoid relapse: booster sessions; encourage to continue self-exposure on their own‬
‭- complicated grief: erroneous beliefs about death →‬‭avoidance preventing integration of loss‬
‭- also may be used in treating depression targeting‬‭experiential avoidance‬
‭- exposure may be effective beyond reduction of pathological fear, i.e., whenever pathological emotions‬
‭arising from erroneous beliefs are maintained through cognitive/ beh avoidances‬

,‭ h 2. Clinical‬
C -‭ to empirically identify the controllable variables maintaining a behavior (functionally related)‬
‭Functional Analysis:‬ ‭- to personalize the intervention‬
‭Understanding the‬ ‭- to complement the current diagnostic system when the diagnostic doesn't entirely fit, treatment failed or‬
‭Contingencies of‬ ‭doesn't exist; an alternative to the "diagnose and treat" paradigm‬
‭Reinforcement‬ ‭-‬‭structuralism‬‭= focuses on‬‭unobservable‬‭internal‬‭events, via introspection‬
‭-‬‭functionalism‬‭= emphasis on the‬‭observable‬‭behavior;‬‭answer "why" by specifying contextual relationships‬
‭and how they influence the beh; assumes all beh to be adaptive and useful in some way‬
‭-‬‭behaviorism‬‭= primary goals is the prediction and‬‭control of beh‬
‭- applied predominantly to treat observable beh in developmentally disabled, mood, SUD, eating, psychotic‬
‭- private/ internal events (e.g., emotions and thoughts) come under the same control as overt beh → also‬
‭apply to functional analysis‬
‭Distinguishing features‬ ‭-‬‭focus on the function/ purpose of beh rather than‬‭its topography‬‭: through an analysis of the controlling‬
‭variables → can hypothesize how to change it!‬
‭- topography = descriptive features independent of the consequences; fail to explain‬‭why‬‭the beh is‬
‭occurring‬
‭-‬‭the unit of analysis is the whole person‬‭interacting‬‭in and with a particular environment (beh cannot be‬
‭understood in isolation!, to also understand the‬‭function‬‭of the beh)‬
‭-‬‭idiographic approach‬‭: examines beh on an individual‬‭basis → identify targets relevant for the specific‬
‭client and contexts‬
‭-‬‭enhanced treatment utility of the assessment‬‭(how‬‭it helps with treatment outcomes) → FA is inherently‬
‭perspective!: indicates a specific and empirically supported course of action/ intervention!‬
‭-‬‭dynamic and iterative‬‭: FA is iterative and self-correcting‬‭in nature; ongoing processes of adapting the‬
‭prescribed intervention to new data from the beh and context‬
‭Basic behavioral principles‬ ‭-‬‭assumption‬‭: individual occurs within an environmental‬‭context that interacts with the beh → this‬
‭interaction =‬‭"‬‭contingencies of behavior‬‭"‬
‭-‬‭one contingency = antecedents: behavior → consequences‬‭(it is three-term: A:B → C)‬
‭- A, B, C relate in a probabilistic manner (not mechanistic cause!);‬‭A increases the probability of B‬‭(set the‬
‭occasion for it),‬‭B produces C‬
‭-‬‭antecedents‬‭= environmental stimuli consistently‬‭present in the context in which the beh occurs; grouped‬
‭into‬‭stimulus classes‬‭(= same effect on beh)‬
‭- emotions, thoughts (covert beh) are not considered as solitary antecedents (not in a vacuum)‬
‭-‬‭beh‬‭= anything an individual does (also private‬‭e.g., emotions and thoughts); produce similar consequences‬
‭(=‬‭response classes‬‭of beh)‬
‭-‬‭consequences‬‭= changes in the environment after‬‭the beh that alter the probability of future occurrences‬
‭of the beh‬
‭-‬‭positive/ negative‬‭contingencies = added/ removed‬‭stimulus from environment‬
‭-‬‭reinforcing/ punishing‬‭contingencies = increase/‬‭decrease occurrence of beh‬
‭- use FA to know how a stimulus/ event affect future beh‬
‭Functioning relations‬ ‭-‬‭reinforcement‬‭: increase in the frequency of behavior‬‭as a function of the beh consequences; negatively‬
‭reinforced = stimulus taken away was a‬‭punisher‬
‭-‬‭punishment‬‭: decrease in the frequency of behavior‬‭as a function of the beh consequences; positively‬
‭punished =‬‭punisher‬
‭-‬‭extinction‬‭: a process that‬‭breaks the contingency‬‭between beh and its consequence; when beh no longer‬
‭produces a consequence; often precipitated by an extinction burst (= rapid increase in the frequency of the‬
‭beh before it decreases)‬
‭Guidelines for conducting‬ ‭- collaborate with the client to clearly formulate the concerns and to develop achievable goals‬
‭an FA‬ ‭Step 1: identify characteristics of the client through a broad assessment‬
‭-‬ ‭strengths e.g., personal resources; social support, financial…‬
‭-‬ ‭weaknesses e.g., diminished perspective taking, poor physical health…‬
‭-‬ ‭FA is a next step in assessment (after diagnosis) to investigate the function of the topographical beh‬
‭Step 2: develop preliminary analysis in terms of behavioral principles‬
‭-‬ ‭to determine the function of the beh‬
‭-‬ ‭assessment is limited to the controllable variables, identifying relationships that can be altered‬
‭-‬ ‭goal of FA‬‭= create an effective intervention linked‬‭directly to the analysis of the beh‬

, ‭Step 3: gather additional info and finalize the conceptual analysis‬
‭-‬ ‭describe the analysis as a working hypothesis that the clinician and client will test together‬
‭-‬ ‭evaluate the components of the analysis: interview relatives, conduct home-based assessments…‬
‭Step 4: devise an intervention based on step 3‬
‭-‬ ‭goal of intervention = modify the existing beh through (a) behavioral skills training, (b) alteration of‬
‭the environment, (c) modification of flawed rule statements affecting the beh‬
‭-‬ ‭Establishing alternative ways to engage with life via contingencies that support the new beh‬
‭Step 5: implement intervention and assess change‬‭(incorporate‬‭the new data in the FA as it is collected)‬
‭Step 6: if outcome is unacceptable, recycle back to step 2 and 3‬
‭Limitations of FA‬ ‭- validity and reliability of FA has not been extensively evaluated‬
‭- requires time and resources → may be most cost effective when standardized interventions do not‬
‭effectively address all the causal variables, or when there is no evidence-based treatment available (often‬
‭with complex cases, i.e., multiple problems, variables)‬

‭ h 9. Behavioral‬
C -‭ "‬‭if there is one certainty in behavioral science,‬‭it is that positive reinforcement, when applied well, can generate,‬
‭activation (BA)‬ ‭change, and maintain behavior‬‭" → a scientific law‬
‭- positive reinforcement (R+) is fundamental to human experience‬
‭- to the behaviorist: contingencies indicate the meaning of the behavior‬
‭the‬‭principle‬‭of BA‬ ‭=‬‭therapeutic scheduling of specific activities for‬‭the client to complete in daily life that function to increase contact‬
‭with diverse, stable, and personally meaningful sources of positive reinforcement‬
‭- scheduling of specific activities is primary component; also secondary techniques (see below)‬
‭- increase R+ is the ultimate goal; other techniques e.g., reducing escape and avoidance behaviors (negatively‬
‭reinforced) → increase R+ (it's a constructive therapy!, to create rich, meaningful lives)‬
‭- positive reinforcement as diverse, stable, and personally meaningful → not a hedonistic search for‬
‭pleasure! (the goal = the client's behavioral repertoire to be diverse, stable, and meaningful for the client!)‬
‭BA's model of‬
‭psychopathology‬




-‭ depression begins with environments characterized by losses of, reductions in, or chronically low levels of‬
‭positive reinforcement (R+); e.g., loss of a loved one, loss of a job, chronic deprivation of R+ (abuse, neglect),‬
‭inability to obtain and maintain contact with R+ (e.g., social skills);‬
‭- depression can also begin with increased negative reinforcers (R-) → restricts the chance to experience R+‬
‭for fulfilling beh, e.g., financial stress, routine of "to-do's"; in a life dedicated to avoiding aversives (increased‬
‭R-), it is difficult to contact R+ (decreases R+ for positive behavior)‬
‭- many forms of psychopathology (depression, suicidal beh) are functions of unhealthy efforts to avoid‬
‭negative emotions, thoughts, memories, and social interactions → avoidance contributes to reductions in R+‬
‭- R+ of depressed behavior, e.g., family that gives room and covers for inactivity, appreciates being more at‬
‭home → healthy beh is not prompted, R+ is low‬
‭- reinforcement and mood covary together (anhedonia, negative mood, depression)‬
‭- reinforcement maintains behavior → lost R+ leads to reduction in the frequency or even extinction of‬
‭previous behavior/ activity‬
‭- increased R- and R+ for depressed behavior → increase in avoidance and depressed behavior → beh‬
‭changes the environment (reinforcement)‬
‭- clinical depression as a result of a self-perpetuating cycle of reinforcer, mood, and behavior changes‬


‭BA's theory of treatment‬
‭mechanism‬




‭- contingency management techniques alter the environment directly => target behavior to increase R+‬

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper yasminbosquetti. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,49  3x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd