100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary 1.3C Statistics: An Introduction (FSWPE1-032) €8,49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary 1.3C Statistics: An Introduction (FSWPE1-032)

 41 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht

Everything you need in one document! Summary of all tutorial meetings, required literature (Moore+Passer), articles and lectures that you need to prepare for the exam of 1.3C Statistics course at EUR. Very clear and well-written notes in English from the academic year 2019/20.

Voorbeeld 3 van de 28  pagina's

  • Nee
  • Chapter 1-7
  • 1 december 2020
  • 28
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)
avatar-seller
onlyk
1.3C Statistics 1- An introduction


↑ = more diff. = different bc =because f. = factors beh. = behaviour envir. = environment

↓ = less + = positive indiv. =individual org.= organism acc.= according dev.= development

sit. = situation/al -/neg. = negative ppl = people w/= with wo/= without char.= characteristics

inf.= information m= months y= years lvl= level betw.= between perf.= performance

var.= variable rel.= relationship var.= variable cond.= condition




CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH (1.2C- PB4)
-rel.: direction→ positive rel.- positive values (x > 0), tendency for 2 var. to change in the same
direction

→ negative rel.- negative values (x ‹ 0), tendency for 2 var. to change in the opposite
direction

: form→ linear- data points tend to cluster around a straight line (Pearson correlation)

→ monotonic- consistently positively/negatively one-directional (Spearman correlation)

: consistency & strength- consistency measured, described by numerical value obtained for a
correlation coefficient

-graphs- provide the opportunity to see the characteristics of a rel.

-research types→ correlational- demonstrates existence of a rel. (its strength) betw. 2 var. but
doesn’t explain it/determine causes/imply causation

- measuring 2 diff. var. for each indiv. (1 group w/2 scores for
indiv.)

- there is only observation, no interference

- envir. is not controlled (bc of confounding var.)

→ experimental- demonstrate cause-and-effect rel. betw. 2 var.

- requires manipulation of 1 var. to create conditions

- measures only 1 var., looks for diff. betw. 2/+ groups

→differential- establishes existence of rel. by demonstrating a diff. betw. 2 groups

-uses 1 var. to create groups, then measures the 2 nd var.

-correlation/correlation coefficient- numerical value that describes, measures the rel. betw. 2 var.
- +/- describe direction of the rel.

, - numerical value (0.0-1.0) describes strength, consistency, type
(Pearson/Spearman) indicates the form

-statistical significance- real rel. that exists in population, interprets the strength

-coefficient of determination- squared value of correlation (r2)

-measures % of variability in 1 var. predicted by the other var.

-prediction- using knowledge about 1 var. to help predict/explain the 2 nd var.

- regression- process of using 1 var. to predict another

-multiple regression- 1 var. can be explained by a set of others

- var.: predictor var.

: criterion var. (being explained/predicted)

-non-numerical scores: 1. one score numerical, the other non-numerical

-organize the score into separate groups

2. both non-numerical

-organize data in a matrix w/rows and columns

-reliability- consistency/stability of measurements

-validity- extent to which measures actually measure what they´re supposed to

-limitations→ 3rd var. problem- possibility of 3rd unknown var. controlling var. influencing the rel.

→ directionality- inability to determine which var. is the cause, which the effect

-causality- 1 event affects the other



MEETING 1
Passer CH1: Science and Psychology
-methods by which ppl hold beliefs:

→tenacity- believing something simply bc it is what we have long believed

→authority- relying on other ppl as our source of knowledge and beliefs

-when: we believe the person has expertise of the subject

: we perceive the person as trustworthy

→reason- use of logic/rational arguments to reach a conclusion (used by scientists to
construct theories, derive hypotheses to test theories)

, →empiricism- acquiring knowledge through observation, experience (all knowledge derived
from experience)

-confirmation/congeniality bias- tendency to seek inf. supporting our views,
avoiding disconfirming inf.

→science- systematically gathering and evaluating empirical evidence to answer questions,
test ideas

-relies on empirical evidence, reasoning

-scientists want to describe, explain, predict and control events

-variable- factor/attribute that can assume 2/+ values (can differ, change)

-description- involves dev. of coding systems, identifies things

-explanation→ hypothesis- proposition about the causes/outcomes of an event, how variables are
related (formed by reasoning)

→theory- set of formal statements specifying how/why variables are related

-broader than hypotheses

-causes: distal- remote causes

: proximal- immediate causes

-causal inference- to conclude that var. X had a causal effect on var. Y

: covariation- as X changes, Y changes

: temporal order- change in X occurs before the change in Y

: absence of plausible alternative explanations

-prediction- hypothesis/theory testing, applied prediction (if….then)

-2 var./events related→ using knowledge about 1 var. to make predictions about the other

-control- having an influence over research settings/procedures/application of scientific knowledge

-being able to decide what var. to study, know when to measure them

-applying scientific knowledge to improve lives

-assumptions: events are not random, they are regular/in pattern

: patterns have underlying causes

: causes are possible to discover

-empirical question/claim- can be tested through observation

-falsifiability- an assertion is testable if we can envision gathering some type of empirical evidence
that will reveal the assertion as false

-operationism- defining a concept in terms of the specific procedures used to represent it

-replication- process of repeating a study to determine whether the original findings will be upheld

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper onlyk. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 83637 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€8,49  3x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen