100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
All Lecture Notes Introduction to Research Methodology €2,99
In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

All Lecture Notes Introduction to Research Methodology

 88 keer bekeken  2 keer verkocht

In this document, I made a summary of all of the lectures Michelle Nuijten gave in the course Introduction to Research Methodology. There are a few things in this summary that she explains but aren't in the book, but she mentions them because they are important.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 14  pagina's

  • 1 februari 2021
  • 14
  • 2020/2021
  • College aantekeningen
  • Michelle nuijten
  • Alle colleges
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (4)
avatar-seller
LauraWarmenhoven
Research Methodology – Video’s

Video 1.1 – The Empirical Cycle

Observation = Collect and group empirical facts.

Theory (induction) = Form a theory based on your
observations.

Prediction = Deduce a hypothesis/prediction from your
theory.

Testing = Run a study to test your hypothesis

Evaluation = What do the study outcomes (the new
observations) mean for the theory?




Video 1.2 – Falsifiability
To reach scientific insights, we follow the empirical cycle. You have to follow the entire cycle,
you can’t take shortcuts.
Some theories cannot be tested. They are in line with every possible observation.
Irrefutable theories
 These theories are unfalsifiable. It is impossible to find evidence against the theory.
If a theory is irrefutable:
- We can’t determine which of multiple theories is the correct one
- And we will not be any closer to explaining a phenomenon
A theory can be falsifiable, even if no one has ever made an observation against the theory
 The point is that observation against a theory should be possible (e.g. gravity)
Summary:
A good scientific theory has to be falsifiable
It has to be possible to make observations that are not in line with the theory
If a theory is irrefutable, it is unfalsifiable and with that not scientific.

Video 1.3 – Accumulating knowledge
To be able to follow the entire empirical cycle, theories have to lead to falsifiable predictions.
With the test results (of a study) we evaluate the theory
- What if a prediction is confirmed?
- What if a prediction is not confirmed?
Formulate a prediction
- A theory is general and not immediately testable
- We need a concrete prediction to perform a test.
Prediction is confirmed  It is virtually impossible to prove a theory because;
- You can never rule out all alternative explanations
- You tested only one concrete prediction and a theory makes an infinite number of
predictions.
Prediction is not confirmed  It is virtually impossible to refute a theory with a single study
because;
- Something could have gone wrong
You cannot keep fixing your theory infinitely. At some point you’ll run the risk that your theory
becomes unfalsifiable.

Knowledge accumulates slowly
- One study is no study

, - Evidence accumulates over longer periods of time
- A theory is never ‘proven’: we just hold on to it until something better comes along

Video 2.1 – Personal Experience
Personal experience is not a good source of information because;
1) There is no comparison group
2) There are possible alternative explanations (confounds)
In scientific research we make systematic comparisons under controlled circumstances to
avoid these problems.

Video 2.2 – Judging Claims
3 Claims
1) Frequency claims: Describe a particular rate or degree of a single variable
2) Association claim: Association claims argue that one level of a variable is likely to be
associated with a particular level of another variable
3) Causal claim: Argue that one of the variables is responsible for changing the other.
4 Validities
 Validity = Whether a claim is reasonable, accurate and justifiable
1) Construct validity: How well is a conceptual variable (or a construct) operationalized?
2) External validity: How well do the results of the study generalize to other
people/context?
3) Statistical validity: To what extend are a study’s statistical conclusion as accurate and
reasonable?
4) Internal validity: Can we eliminate alternative explanations for an association?
 Third-variable criterion = Something else that explains the association

Video 3.1 – Ethical treatment of participants
Participating in scientific research should be voluntary.
Personal data can’t be shared/stored without permission  Anonymity/confidentiality
Prior to the study participants sign an informed consent.
After the study, the researchers describe the nature of the deception and why it was
necessary.
 Debriefing.
IRB  The Institutional Review Board weighs pros and cons based on the relevant ethical
principles in rules.

Video 3.2 – Research Misconduct
Plagiarism  representing the ideas or words of other as one’s own
Falsification  Influencing a study’s result by changing data or influencing participant to act
in line with the hypothesis
Fabrication  Making up data that fit the hypothesis

Grey area?
- When is something an innocent mistake and when is something misconduct?
 Has to do with intention, which is hard to determine.
 Sometimes it suffices to conclude that the research (not the researcher) is unreliable
Scientific misconduct can sometimes be spotted in articles.
It is hard to distinguish between misconduct and grey areas.
It takes a lot of time to clean up the consequences of scientific misconduct.


Video 4.1 – Operationalizing
 To create a concrete variable to measure
Constructing a variable:
1. Choose a structure (continuous or categorical)
2. Think about what the theoretical core of the construct is, and how that can be
expressed in human behavior; how could this behavior manifest itself?

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper LauraWarmenhoven. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,99  2x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd