1. In less than 300 words, explain what the problem of induction is. Include in your answer
clear definitions and an example of induction, what the problem with induction is, a
proposed solution to the problem, and finally why that solution may not work.
The problem of induction refers to the philosophical challenge of justifying the use of inductive
reasoning to acquire knowledge. Inductive reasoning refers to the drawing of probable conclusions
based on particular observations, assuming these observations are true. This kind of reasoning is
pervasive in everyday life, and is also the basis of scientific inquiry, but the problem of induction
raises the question of the warrantability of these practices.
An example of induction is:
Premise 1: Swan A is white.
Premise 2: Swan B is white.
Premise 3: All the swans observed thereafter white.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is probable that all swans are white.
The problem of induction was first formulated by the philosopher David Hume. Hume argued that no
matter how many observations we made in the past there is no certainty that these observations
with be matched in the future. For example, even if all past swans observed are white, there is no
guarantee that future swans will be white as well. The problem of induction is that the conclusions
we induce are never certain, and are always open to being falsified.
One proposed solution is to argue that, even though the conclusions we induce are not certain, they
are still reasonable to believe based on the evidence available to us. This is the approach taken by
most scientists, who accept the inevitability of uncertainty in their conclusions, because their work is
based on assumptions, but still believe they are justified in their methods. This however does not
solve the problem of induction because the conclusions are always open to falsification.
In conclusion, the problem of induction challenges the validity of inductive reasoning which has led
to various proposed solutions to this problem. While these solutions may have their own
advantages, they also have limitations and cannot fully resolve the problem of induction.
2. In less than 300 words, explain Karl Popper’s theory of falsificationism. Include in your
answer Popper’s reasoning against verificationism, concept of pseudoscience, and the
process of scientific testing.
Karl Popper's theory of falsificationism is a philosophical approach that tests the validity of scientific
theories by testing whether it can be falsified or not. Popper argued that scientific theories cannot
be confirmed or verified, only corroborated. According to him, something can only be classified as
scientific if it can be falsified.
Popper's theory of falsificationism was developed as a response to verificationism, the idea that
scientific theories can be confirmed or verified through observation. Popper argued that this
approach was flawed, as it ignored the fact that scientific theories are always open to falsification.
Instead, he proposed that scientific theories should be formulated in a way that makes them
susceptible to being disproved through rigorous testing.
Popper also distinguished between science and pseudoscience. He argued that pseudoscientific
theories are theories that cannot be potentially falsified or tested empirically. Such as Freudian
psychoanalysis. In contrast, scientific theories are always open to the possibility of being falsified,
such as Newtonian Laws.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TeeGee10. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R85,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.