Samenvatting

summary + lecture notes International Business Ethics

2 keer verkocht

Instelling
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)

summary from the course International Business Ethics. Also added are the lecture notes from all the slides of the lecturer. Summary is all the material needed for the exam

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 3 van de 26 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Heel boek samengevat? Nee
Wat is er van het boek samengevat? 2 t/m 14
Geupload op 21 maart 2022
Aantal pagina's 26
Geschreven in 2021/2022
Type Samenvatting

business ethics
international business
philospophy
business administration
bedrijfskunde
stakeholder theory
organizational justice
csr
globalization
sustainability
lead
corporate social responsibility

Volgen

ievewillems Lid sinds 3 jaar 40 documenten verkocht

€5,89

In winkelwagen

Opslaan

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Summary International Business Ethics

Lecture 1 (31-01-22)

Introduction 

Why Business Ethics?
 The goodness of business cannot be taken for granted
 Decent ethics make good profits
 CEO’s and managers are in need of moral assistance
 Society at large expects decent moral behaviour of companies and organizations
 It is just interesting to think about the values and norms that underlie business practices
 Philosophy has a lot to say about business
 It is important that people can trust corporations

Business ethics is about crossings:
 between business and ethics
 between business and philosophy
 between ethics and continental philosophy

The idea of crossings:
 implies a willingness to take a critical stance
 to cross positions that have remained unanswered
 to develop your own position or perspective on business problems
 crossing divides

The most important ‘divide’ here is the one between analytical and continental philosophy. Business
ethics is usually firmly entrenched in analytical philosophy. In the book, we claim that business ethics
can benefit from insights from continental philosophy

Characteristics of analytical and continental philosophy  from the analytical perspective
Analytical:
 Language analysis
 Scientific
 Disciplined
 Politically neutral
 Methodological
 Believe in progress
 Real philosophy
 Optimistic

Continental:
 Poetry
 Artistic, nonsensical
 Wild, unruly
 Politically left
 Chaotic
 There is no single truth, no progress
 Rhetoric, pessimistic
Characteristics of analytical and continental philosophy  from the continental perspective

,Continental:
 Analysis of being
 Profound
 Realistic
 Politically engaged
 Realistic
 Critical about the endeavours of science
 Philosophical

Analytical:
 Stuck in language games
 Shallow
 Naïve
 Neutral, but also petty
 Docile followers of science
 Docile followers of liberalism
 Not serious

What is business ethics?
1. It is the part of practical philosophy which studies good and bad in organizations
2. It is keen on improving the status quo in business and organizations
3. Criticism: It does not question the status quo
4. In this sense, it is not a serious ethics, and it does not provide clear cut answers
5. In some sense, the agenda of our book is to infuse business ethics with more philosophical ethics
6. We bring in continental thought in order to make this possible

Aporia  Philosophical problems are deemed to be aporetic of they do not lend themselves to easy
solutions. Aporia literally means ‘no’, ‘passage’, or ‘opening’. Aporias cause doubt, puzzlement,
confusion, and even perplexity. One of the synonyms frequently used for aporetic is undecidable.
Aporias are then theoretical situations in which one cannot decide. The concept of aporia has been
pivotal in the work of continental philosophers. It is often used to undermine the idea that words,
concepts, sentences, or language as such have determinate meaning.

Lecture 2 (01-02-22)

Stakeholders 

A stakeholder is any group or individual who can affect, or is affected by, the achievement of a
corporation’s purpose. Stakeholders include employees, customers, suppliers, stockholders, banks,
environmentalists, governments and other groups who can help or hurt the corporation (Ed
Freeman).

Debate between Milton Friedman (1912-2006) and Ed Freeman (1951-…).
Milton Friedman (shareholder theory):
 There is just one social responsibility of the corporation: it should increase its profits (as long
as it stays within the rules of the game)
 Stakeholder theory is dangerous (for it undermines democracy)
 It is the task of politicians, not of entrepreneurs, to decide about the distribution of wealth
 Stakeholder theory is a form of socialism
 Shareholder capitalism serves the institutions of democracy and freedom much better than
stakeholder theory

, Ed Freeman (stakeholder theory):
 We need a plural apperception of the relation between business and society
 Isolating economic tasks from social tasks is intellectually fallacious (separation fallacy).
Thinking that economy does not belong to the social is systematically wrong-headed
 Stakeholders’ interests should therefore inform strategic management
 Freeman opts for a prescriptive approach; it is, however, not difficult to understand
stakeholder theory in a descriptive sense: many organizations are overwhelmed by clashes of
interests

Why does this matter?
1. In fact it is a debate about what we (society) are supposed to expect from corporations in terms of
their performance.
2. It matters in a pragmatic sense: managers are keen to know what society expects from them
3. It is politically relevant: are business corporations better equipped to solve societal problems than
politics?
4. Freeman advocates a ‘reasonable pluralism’, which is supposed to bent together the central
concepts of business with those of ethics

There is a lot of debate about so-called stakeholder capitalism (rather than shareholder capitalism).
Critics argue it is just about saving capitalism from capitalists.

Stakeholder capitalism  a form of capitalism in which companies seek a long-term value creation
by taking into account the needs of all their stakeholders, and society at large.
Shareholder capitalism  a corporate executives’ only social responsibility is to increase profits for
only the owners and shareholders.

Another discussion lurking in the background: Will entrepreneurs do a better job than managers or
politicians?
Michael Useem (Harvard professor): Now that same challenge faces Trump as he makes the
transition from entrepreneur and insurgent candidate to leading a public enterprise. While sharing
control with a board of directors on Capitol Hill and a judiciary whose purpose is to ensure that he
follows the rules.

Philanthro-capitalism  Bill Gates, Warrant Buffet, George Soros and others are ‘hyper- agents’:
individuals who can do what it would otherwise take a social movement to do.
Motivation: ‘Richesse oblige’ is a driving spirit of philanthro-capitalism.
Philanthro-capitalism is a new way of doing philanthropy, which mirrors the way that business is
done in the for-profit capitalist world. Philanthropy is the desire to promote the welfare of others,
expressed especially by the generous donation of money to good causes.

Critique of philanthro-capitalism:
 Richesse doesn’t just expect to oblige it expects to be obliged as well
 The philantrocapitalist project is irreducibly undemocratic, if not indeed antidemocratic
 It sets the scientific agenda (researchers go where money is)
 David Rieff: what this means is that, for the first time in modern history, it has become the
conventional wisdom that private business, the most politically influential, undertaxed, and
underregulated sector among those groups that dispose of real power and wealth in the
world, as well as the least democratically accountable, should be entrusted with the welfare
and fate of the powerless and the hungry.

Back to stakeholder theory: Freeman remains optimistic about the willingness of entrepreneurs to
embark on his reasonable pluralism. Many other business ethicists are as well.

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.