Samenvatting
Samenvatting The Media Landscape Communicatiewetenschap
- Instelling
- Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
Samenvatting The Media Landscape Communicatiewetenschap
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 42 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 42 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
lOMoARcPSD|11911780The Media Landscape –
Communicatiewetenschappen
Key words:
● ES = example
● imp = important/importance
● comm = communication
● + = and, also
● CH = China, GR = Germany …
● Q = question
Week 1
Lecture 1 (+ chapter one)
The media industry: broadcasting, print, film and recording industries + advertising,
marketing, PR, social media companies …
ES: Google not really, Netflix yes (bc original content)
➔ Media company = a company whose primary function is to produce or
distribute media content.
➔ Mass media = media in traditional sense (ES: tv, print)
◆ 5 key characteristics (that make them unique)
● One to many = one-way communication
○ identical message to a mass audience
○ no individual fragmentation (especially back in the days, ES just 1
news channel)
● Experimental goods: it’s about the experience
○ Value = immaterial attributes
○ Originality, intellectual property, stories told
● High fixed/first copy costs
○ First version >> very expensive
○ Low marginal costs
◆ Economies of scale = price per unit decreases as quantity
of output increases
● Potential for (cheap) re-versioning:
○ re-selling in different formats, leads to ↓
◆ Economies of scope = average production costs decrease
as variety of output increases
◆ ES movie at the theatre >> cheaper versions (netflix, dvd…)
○ But also: spin-offs, branded products …
● High risk!
, lOMoARcPSD|11911780
○ depends on consumer taste >> hard to predict
○ High first copy costs regardless # of consumers
◆ ES: “bomb” only a budgetary connotation
◆ for every media content (not only movies)
The mass media market
Dual-product market = media companies produce 2 things:
❏ Content >> sold to audience
❏ Audiences >> sold to advertisers
❏ Attention Economy: attention is the real product being sold/bought
❏ Result: advertising goals influence content/strategy
❏ Problematic for journalism, particularly: quality news outlet VS
scandalistic magazines (sell more ads = more money)
❏ Broader inherent tension
❏ creative industries VS commercial needs
❏ BUT… mass media market is changing
❏ for Hodkinson: digitalization / digital technologies are the biggest force
❏ 4 main outcomes of this change
Media organizations (at least some?) should be socially responsible.
A few core responsibilities (what we expect from media)
➔ Forum for exchange of ideas/opinions
➔ Integrative influence for diverse societies
➔ Protection of core values/vulnerable audiences
➔ Mostly for journalism, but also others?
Strong reactions to change
❖ McLuhan’s optimism:
➢ Technology itself matters (the medium is the message)
➢ New tech extends senses
➢ New (cool) media:
, lOMoARcPSD|11911780
■ Audiences free from hierarchies, isolation
■ we have more power VS news to be published
■ Away from officialdom toward ‘everyday talk’
■ Toward a global village
❖ Postman’s pessimism:
➢ Print age: detailed, relevant, localized, coherent, rational
➢ Post-telegraph: dazzling stories from afar outweigh the relevant, local
➢ TV/images → superficiality
■ Attention and rationality decreased! BC now i can choose
whatever I want, but I can’t pay attention
■ Passive audience
❖ Critiques of the critiques
➢ Both: technological determinism
➢ technology itself = primary cause of social change
➢ simplifies & overplays tech, ignores social context
➢ ignores power relations behind development/use
■ Optimism: tech as solution to man-made problems
■ Pessimism: blames tech for social problems
➢ Problematic because…
❖ Du Gay’s et al. (1997): circuit of culture
➢ Tech’s significance best understood thru 5 processes:
■ Production: how/when/why was it developed?
■ Representation: how is it talked about?
■ Regulation: how is it controlled?
■ Consumption: how do we use it?
■ Identity: what does it say about us, when we use it?
SO …
● Media industry has shifting borders, definitions
● Its products, market structures are unique
● It’s undergoing massive changes
● Theorists react to those changes very strongly
○ And companies do, too
○ But, we are constantly engaging with it
■ Now... to the “media life” idea from Deuze (2011)
● Media now so central that we don’t notice them
● We don’t live with media, but in media
■ 2 clear manifestations:
● Personal/individualized information space
● Always-available global connectivity
■ 2 main consequences:
, lOMoARcPSD|11911780
● Liquefied boundaries between work, play, alone, interaction
● Life changed to accommodate/exploit media
● + (Individualized togetherness)
■ Remember diversification, interactivity, mobility, convergence? >> All
reflected here
● Technological changes/responses create this new
individualized connectivity – more next week(s)
Summary
❏ Media industry, mass media, & market:
❏ Unique characteristics, fuzzy borders
❏ Social resp./creative-commercial tension unique
❏ Rise of digital media = further challenges, changes
❏ Systematically opposed responses to change
❏ “media life”: one approach to theorizing media
❏ Importance of “individualized info spaces”
❏ We saw (reinforced) individuality in your own habits
Article - Media Life (by Mark Deuze)
❖ Modern liquid society (Bauman)
➢ mediapolis: comprehensively mediated public space where media
penetrates all aspects of contemporary life
■ increasing invisibility of media BC unconsciousness when used
intensely
■ can’t see media habits BC they are a constitutive part of them
■ living in their own personal information space
➢ media NOT as somehow located outside of lived experience, but rather
AS intrinsically part of it.
■ our life is lived in, rather than with, media
■ we are living a media life
❖ Other theories: media ecology (McLuhan), mediatization >> aim to explore
how changes in society interact with trends in media
➢ BUT tend to confirm the traditional biases and boundaries of media
studies
❖ Denis McQuail: media are NOT crucial to everyday life and public communication BC of
their potential to reach an entire national or otherwise mass public with a restricted range of
content and experiences, but rather where their impact is premised on ‘the voluntary
engagement of the public in its own immersion in a rich and varied world of mediated
experience’
❖ media are everywhere, and therefore nowhere
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper madeliefbodet. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 71498 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen