Samenvatting
Summary philosophy of science exam
summary for the exam
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 21 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 21 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
4 beoordelingen
Door: burcuzengin • 4 jaar geleden
Door: zhongjiejessica • 7 jaar geleden
Door: mohammadshahinalam • 8 jaar geleden
Door: lvdk1005 • 8 jaar geleden
Heel gedetaileerd maar genoeg samengevat voor snel lezen.
Beschikbare oefenvragen
Oefenvragen
22 Oefenvragen
Gratis
13 verkocht
Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen
1.
What is the scientific realism debate about? What is, in your opinion, the most convincing argument in support of antirealism?
Antwoord: It is about whether we should believe the realist, or the antirealist. Most convincing argumetn: We should understand scientific theories as instruments to predict and control observable phenomena, and the aim of science is to provide us with empirically adequate theories.
2.
What is Bayesianism? What are the two central ideas?
Antwoord: Bayesianism tries to understand evidence using probability theory. When there is uncertainty about a hypothesis, observational evidence can sometimes raise or lower the probability of the hypothesis. There is a formula that is like a magic bullet for the evidence problem: Bayes’s theorem (18th century)\" P(h|e)= P(e|h)P(h)/P(e) The two central ideas of Bayesianism: 1. The idea that e confirms h if e raises the probability of h. 2. The idea that probabilities should be updated in a way dictated by Bayes’s theorem.
3.
What\'s the relevance -- if any -- of feminism to our understanding of how science works?
Antwoord: Goal: To examine how gender relations have shaped the content, goals and practice of the sciences.Science should be value free. Scientific reasoning is objective to the extent that it is free of moral, political and social values.
4.
Explain the \"Dutch book\" argument. Do you find the argument convincing?
Antwoord: If your degrees of belief do not conform to the principles of the probability calculus, there are possible gambling situations in which you are guaranteed to lose money, no matter how things turn out.There is a guarantee because these situations are ones in which you are betting on both sides of a proposition, at various different odds. (betting on all het horses in the race). Anyone who does not keep his degrees of belief in line with the probability calculus is irrational in an important sense. I do find this convincing.
5.
What is the covering the covering law model of explanation? The shadow cast by a flagpole is supposed to cause a problem for this model of explanation. What exactly is the problem and how can it be solved?
Antwoord: covering law theory of explanation (20th century). The view was first developed in detail by Hempel and Oppenheim in a paper (1948). - explanandum is whatever is being explained. - Explanans is the thing that is doing the explaining. - If we ask “why X?” then X is the explanandum. If we answer “Because Y” then Y is the explanans. The asymmetry problem is most famous illustrated by the flagpole and the shadow. • Suppose we have a flagpole casting a shadow on a sunny day. o Why is the shadow X meters long? • According to the covering law theory, a good explanation is: deducing the length of the shadow from the height of the flagpole, the position of the sun and the laws of optics. This argument can even be made deductively valid. • The problem is we can just as good run an argument in another direction, we can deduce the height of the pole from the length of the shadow. o We cannot run an equally good explanation in both directions, though the covering law says we can. o It is not fine to explain the length of the flagpole in terms of the shadow and sun.
6.
What is the \"symmetry principle\" endorsed by the strong program in the sociology of knowledge?\'
Antwoord: The symmetry principle = all forms of belief and behaviour should be approached using the same kinds of explanations. Our own assessment of an idea can not have an effect on how we explain things.
7.
What are the 4 norms that are part of Merton\'s account of science? What do they imply?
Antwoord: -universalism = the idea that the personal attributes and social background of a person are irrelevant to the scientific value of the person\'s ideas. -Communism = the common ownership of scientific ideas and results (anyone can make use of any scientific idea in his or her work) - Disinterestedness = Scientists are supposed to act for the benefit of a common scientific enterprise, rather than personal gain. -Organized skepticism = A community-wide pattern of challenging and testing ideas instead of taking them on trust.
8.
What is trivial observation?
Antwoord: Science is practiced in a social context and governed by social norms. Scientists are: - employed by some institution - often working in a team - have to apply to funding bodies for grants - have to publish their results in journals edited by other scientists
9.
What is the traditional answer to this question: - Are the sciences neutral with respect to the values that characterize the context in which they are practiced?
Antwoord: Scientific knowledge is objective, value-free, and context-independent.
10.
What is the traditional answer to this question: Does the social context in which scientific research is carried out affect the outcomes of research?
Antwoord: The social context in which an investigation is carried out does not affect its outcomes
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Table of ContentsChapter 8|The challenge from Sociology of science .......................................................................................................................... 2
Robert Merton and the “Old” sociology of science ..................................................................................................................... 2
The rise of the strong program .................................................................................................................................................... 2
Leviathan and Latour.................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 9|Feminism and Science Studies .......................................................................................................................................... 5
The man of reason ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5
The case of primatology ............................................................................................................................................................... 5
Feminist Epistemology ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Science studies, the Science wars, and the Sokal Hoax .............................................................................................................. 5
Chapter 10|Naturalistic philosophy in theory and practice ............................................................................................................... 7
What is naturalism? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Quine, Dewey, and others ........................................................................................................................................................... 7
The theory-ladenness of observation .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Chapter 11|Naturalism and the Social structure of Science .............................................................................................................. 9
Science as a process ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Kitcher and the Division of Scientific labor.................................................................................................................................. 9
Social structure and Empiricism ................................................................................................................................................. 10
Chapter 12|Scientific Realism .......................................................................................................................................................... 11
Approaching Scientific Realism .................................................................................................................................................. 11
A statement of scientific realism ............................................................................................................................................... 11
Confidence ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11
Challenges from Traditional empiricism .................................................................................................................................... 12
Metaphysical Constructivism ..................................................................................................................................................... 12
Kant ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Bad view ................................................................................................................................................................................. 13
Van Fraassen’s view (1980) ........................................................................................................................................................ 13
Models ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Chapter 13|Explanation................................................................................................................................................................... 14
The rise and fall of the covering law theory of Explanation ..................................................................................................... 14
Problems ................................................................................................................................................................................ 14
Causation, Unification, and more .............................................................................................................................................. 15
Causation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Unification .............................................................................................................................................................................. 15
Laws and causes ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 14|Bayesianism and Modern theories of evidence ............................................................................................................ 17
Understanding evidence with probability ................................................................................................................................. 17
1|Page
, The subjectivist interpretation of probability ........................................................................................................................... 17
Dutch book ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17
Scientific realism and Theories of evidence .............................................................................................................................. 18
Procedural Naturalism ............................................................................................................................................................... 19
Chapter 15|Empiricism, Naturalism, and scientific realism ............................................................................................................. 20
The apparent tensions ............................................................................................................................................................... 20
Empiricism reformed .................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Summary exam (part 2) Philosophy of Science
Since the first exam included a lot of questions about the centuries and names of books, I included them as detailed as possible
in this summary.
Chapter 8|The challenge from Sociology of science
Robert Merton and the “Old” sociology of science
The ‘sociology of science’ developed in the middle of the twentieth century (founder Robert Merton)
“Mertonian sociology of Science” is basically mainstream sociology applied to the structure of science
and to its historical development. “norms” of science are – a set of basic values that govern scientific
communities. These norms (part of Merton’s account of science) are universalism, communism,
disinterestedness, and organized skepticism.
Universalism à the idea that the personal attributes and social background of a person are irrelevant to
the scientific value of the person’s ideas.
Communism à the common ownership of scientific ideas and results. (Anyone can make use of any
scientific idea in his or her work)
Disinterestedness à scientists are supposed to act for the benefit of a common scientific enterprise,
rather than personal gain.
Organized skepticism à a community-wide pattern of challenging and testing ideas instead of taking
them on trust.
A later added idea: The account of the reward system in science. The basic currency for scientific reward
is recognition, especially for being the first person to come up with an idea. This is the only property
right recognized in science. This system functions mostly to encourage original thinking.
The importance of recognition is made evident by the fact that the history of science is crammed with
priority disputes.
The rise of the strong program
A way in which the old and the new work are often distinguished: The older work wanted to describe
the social structure and social placement of science as a whole but did not try to explain particular
scientific beliefs in sociological terms. The new approach has tried.
The newer sociology embraced Kuhn, holism about testing, incommensurability, new ideas about
observation, and various speculative views about scientific language.
Most famous project: The strong program in the sociology of scientific knowledge, developed by Barnes
and Bloor (1970s). The “symmetry principle” – all forms of belief and behavior should be approached
2|Page
,using the same kinds of explanations. Our own assessment of an idea should have no effect on how we
explain its history and social role. The principle tells us that scientific beliefs are products of the same
general kinds of forces as other kinds of belief. People of all kinds live in communities that have socially
established local norms for regulating belief – norms for supporting claims, for handling disagreement,
for working out who will be listened to and who will be ignored.
Scientists’ community à high prestige, lengthy training and initiation, notoriously bad fashion choices,
and expensive toys.
MacKenzie (1981) argued that the development of some of the most important ideas in modern
statistics should be understood in terms of the role these tools had. Eugenics is the attempt to influence
human evolution by encouraging some people to breed and discouraging others from doing so.
The strong program is also often associated with relativism à standards of rationality, evidence, and
justification. Relativism in this context holds that there is no single set of standards entitled to govern
the justification of beliefs. The norms and standards that govern scientific belief can be justified only
from the inside.
Leviathan and Latour
Two most famous works in recent sociology of science.
1. Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer’s ‘Leviathan and the Air Pump’ (1985)
Discusses the rise of experimental science in seventeenth century England. This battle was not
“science versus religion”, but a battle over some specific scientific issues and over the proper
form for scientific work and argumentation. Boyle won. He wanted to distinguish the public,
cooperative investigation of experimental matters of fact from other kinds of work.
Boyle was not only setting up new ways of organizing work; he was also setting up new ways of
talking: new ways of asking and answering questions, handling objections, and reaching
agreement.
• Scientists are engaged in the manufacture of facts
• We need to get used to the idea that facts in general are made rather than found
Shapin and Schaffer took terms from Wittgenstein, who avoided formulating theories of
anything.
Two ideas that are popular:
“A form of life” is something like a set of basic practices, behaviors, and values. A form of life as
a whole cannot be justified externally.
Concept drawn from Wittgenstein; the “language game”
A language game is something like a pattern of linguistic habits that contribute to a form of life
and make sense within it.
• We should think of the socially maintained patterns of language use as all there is
to the “meaning” of language.
2. Latour and Woolgar’s ‘Laboratory Life’ (1979) à They discovered the chemical structure of
a hormone involved in the regulation of human growth. (Sometimes called the actor-
network theory)
3|Page
, They ignored the ways in which experimental methods in the field are able to discriminate
alternative chemical structures.
Latour saw this processing (that turned the mass of raw materials into the finished products) as
aimed at taking scientific claims and building structures of “support” around them, so they
would eventually be taken as facts. A key step in this process is hiding the human work involved
in turning something into a fact. To turn something into a fact is to make it look like it is not a
human product but is given by nature. Latour sees the scientific work itself as the driver.
We should never give the explanation (why one side succeeded and the other did not) in terms
of nature itself. When one side wins, that side’s version of “the facts” becomes immune to
challenge.
4|Page
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Elinevandeven. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 72042 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen