Voorbeeld 3 van de 12 Oefenvragen
1. How can the neoclassical theory of perfect competition inform theories of competitive advantage?
1. How can the neoclassical theory of perfect competition inform theories of competitive advantage?
•	Theoretical benchmark neoclassical theory of perfect competition
•	Assumes perfect circumstances where the firm is seen as a black box and unitary agent, meaning that the productive knowledge and value appropriation within the firm are excluded or ignored.
•	Assumptions are: 
o	the large number assumption 
o	homogeneity assumption 
o	mobility assumption 
o	rationality assumption 
o	transaction cost assumption
•	Impossible to have sustained competitive advantage, achievement of above normal returns is impossible
•	Only competition on price and entry or exit
•	Zero economic profit (accounting profit still possible)
•	Any deviation a source for competitive advantage, therefore possibility for profit

2. How does Porter’s early view on strategy (see Ghemawat, 1999; Porter, 1979; lecture materials) explain differences in performance among firms?
2. How does Porter’s early view on strategy (see Ghemawat, 1999; Porter, 1979; lecture materials) ...
Key points:
•	Early work: 5-forces, strategic groups, generic strategies
•	Bain type I/O : S-C-P- paradigm
•	Industry effect: attractiveness of industry (5-forces), threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, buyer power, supplier power, rivalry within the industry
•	Strategic groups: clusters of firm which hold similar strategies in terms of key decision variables mobility barriers
•	Firm effect: generic strategies: cost leadership, differentiation, focus

11. Industry incumbents often find it difficult to adapt to radical innovations. Based on the readings and class materials of this week, what could you advise managers of incumbent firms to increase their chances of success in responding to radical innovations in their industry?
11. Industry incumbents often find it difficult to adapt to radical innovations. Based on the readin...
Key points: 
•	Pattern recognition: there are regularities in the development of technology across different context
•	Pattern management: Critical success factors change in more or less predictable ways as technology develops overtime
•	Disruptive technologies/innovation: competence-destroying, incumbent firms dominant design now outdated or destroys the architectural knowledge of the firm
•	Failure to meet customer needs, focus on old value network, whereas this is a dynamic concept too close to the customer base
•	Make sure that the internal organization is able to adapt to architectural innovation: alters the way existing components in a product work together
•	4 phases: first mover advantage in first phase does not automatically mean this is the case in the next phase:
1. Embryonic phase: developing technological competences
2. Market experimentation phase: focus on adaption and organizational capabilities
3. Emerging consensus on standards phase: dominant design emerges
4. Established standard phase: secure competitive competition, competition back to normal
•	Managerial cognition and dominant logic: Dominant logic defines what the firm is about, what its competitors are, what makes it successful. But is based on past success and directs and restrict search activities in relation to innovation. Managers used to this old set of dominant beliefs, restrict search capacities in innovation and influences capability development. Make sure managers remain open minded and welcome new opportunities (R&D).

Omdraaien
Opnieuw proberen