100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
notes of delict claims R133,00   Add to cart

Class notes

notes of delict claims

 4 views  0 purchase

claiming for damages

Preview 4 out of 35  pages

  • May 18, 2021
  • 35
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Makhiwane
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (6)
avatar-seller
anothandosakhela
Chapter 6


Compensatory function
2 forms:
1) Compensation for damage= two eliminate as fully as possible his past and future
patrimonial loss, money is equivalent of damage.
2) Satisfaction= damage is incapable of being compensated, money can not be true
equivalent of impaired interests


Concept of damage:
 Damage is the detrimental impact upon any patrimonial or personality interest
deemed worthy of protection by the law.
 It includes both compensation and satisfaction
 Some losses cannot be claimed because of policy considerations
 De Vos v SA Eagle Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk.


Patrimonial and non-patrimonial loss
 Authors differ in opinion,
 But accept that damage has a broad concept and thereby includes;
 Patrimonial and non-patrimonial loss.


Relationship between patrimonial and non-patrimonial loss
 No clearly defined line
 Similarity; utility; quality of an interest protected by law is infringed, plaintiff
loses something for which he receives money


There are four (4) differences:
i. Patrimonial loss= directly/ naturally expressed in money while non-pecuniary
loss= indirect measurable ito money


ii. Extent of patrimonial loss can be ascertained with precision than extent of non-
patrimonial loss

,iii. Damages for patrimonial loss= true reflection of impaired patrimonial interest
and damage is equivalent to money.
 Non-patrimonial loss= no true relationship between money and injury to
personality


iv. Patrimonial loss= utility of patrimonial interest reduced while interest of non-
patrimonial loss is subject of reduction in non-pecuniary damage


The relationship between damage and wrongfulness
 Usually, act only wrongful if it has caused a harmful consequence
 But damage can be caused without a wrongful act


Relationship between damage and factual causation


 Causation is determined with reference to a consequence (damage)
 There can be an overlapping between the tests employed for causation & damage,
because;
 In order to determine causation the alleged damage-causing event must be
connected with a particular consequence.
 Patrimonial (pecuniary) loss
 Patrimonial loss is the detrimental impact of any patrimonial interest deemed
worthy of protection by law.
 It is the loss or reduction in value of a positive asset in someones patrimony or
creation/ increase of a negative element of such patrimony.
 Union Government (minister of Railways & Harbours) v Warneke: Patrimony is a
universitas of rights and duties
 Patrimonial elements:
 Positive elements> monetary value determined by market value of object and any
limitations eg. Real rights; immaterial property rights; personal rights
 Negative element> eg. debt; expectation of a debt

,Ways in which patrimonial loss is caused:
 loss of a patrimonial element
 Reduction in value of patrimonial element= Rudman v Road Accident Fund> bodily
injuries alone are not sufficient to constitute loss of earning capacity
 Creation/ increase of a debt/creation, acceleration of an expectation of a debt


Forms of patrimonial loss
Lucrum cessans - loss of profit/ prospective loss & loss of patrimonial expectancy;
&
En damnum emergens - all other forms of damage suffered up to date of trial
Damage to property (that belongs to you) & pure economic loss
Direct and consequential loss


1. Assessment of patrimonial damages (2 formulas)
1. Sum-formula approach
 Used cause of once and for all rule- speculative future
 Damage consists in the negative difference between the relevant person’s
current patrimonial position and his hypothetical patrimonial position
 Eg. loss of earning capacity;
 That would have been the current position if;
 The event had not taken place.
 It entails a comparison of an actual current patrimonial sum with a
hypothetical current patrimonial sum-
 Dippenaar v Shield Insurance Co Ltd



2. A concrete (approach)
 concept of damages [easier to prove]
 Must compare what was with what is,
 Do not compare current position with a hypothetical position; which
 Would have existed had the delict not been committed
 Ie. Before and after-

,  Santam Versekeringmaatskappy v Bylevelt.
 Our law should a concrete approach to damage except in cases of future loss,
liability for misrepresentation and loss of profit;
 Where it is necessary to work with a hypothetic element


Suggestion:
 Our law should use a concrete approach to damage except in cases of future
loss, liability for misrepresentation and loss of profit, where it is necessary to
work with a hypothetic element.


Time for assessment of damage
 Generally, date of delict.
 The full extent of damage occurs later:
 Use date upon which the first damage manifested –
 Oslo Land Co Ltd v Union Government.
 Also take into account events between date of delict and date of trial.
 Settlement- General Accident Insurance Co SA Ltd v Summers


2. Prospective/ future patrimonial damage (Lucrum cessans)
Definition:
 Damage in the form of patrimonial or non-patrimonial loss which will;
 With a sufficient degree of probability;
 Materialize after the date of assessment of damage resulting from an earlier
damage-causing event.
 Visser and Potgieter’s view:
 Future damage rests on 2 pillars;
 It has a prospective dimension as well as a present one.
 Even though prospective damage literally only manifests itself in money/
otherwise in future, basis is to be found in impairment of plaintiff’s present
interests.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anothandosakhela. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R133,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81849 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R133,00
  • (0)
  Buy now