100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
RSC2601 Assignment 2 2021 AS PER UPDATED TUTORIAL LETTER (To be used as a guideline only) R50,00
Add to cart

Other

RSC2601 Assignment 2 2021 AS PER UPDATED TUTORIAL LETTER (To be used as a guideline only)

3 reviews
 200 views  10 purchases

This document includes the questions and answers, including page references where applicable.

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • May 24, 2021
  • 14
  • 2020/2021
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (87)

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: maggiemmakgabo • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: lungilenodwala3 • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: theresasaber • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
aj107
Research in the Social
Sciences
RSC2601
College of Human Sciences
Assignment 2 for 2021 (compulsory)
Unique Number: 366275
Due Date: 07 June 2021




QUESTION 1

Twenty-five people who lost a family member through suicide and who are currently
attending a support group, are referred to the researcher by other members in the
support group already in the sample.

This is an example of … sampling.

(1) convenience
(2) purposive
(3) theoretical
(4) snowball

Answer:

Refer to page 162 of the study guide:

, Snowball sampling
Snowball sampling is a technique that involves research respondents’ obtaining other
potential respondents. The term is taken from the analogy of a snowball. In the first stage of
sampling, only a few respondents are identified as having the required characteristics; these
respondents are interviewed by the researcher. These respondents are then used to identify
other people who qualify for inclusion in the sample. The next stage is interviewing the new
persons, and so it carries on until the researcher reaches data saturation. This sampling
technique is particularly useful in observational research and in community studies.
Snowball sampling is also useful for the study of sensitive or hidden populations (eg sex
workers, gays and women who have chosen to have an abortion). For example, the
researcher may personally know someone who has had an abortion. The woman is
contacted and asked if she knows of someone else who has also had an abortion. This type
of networking is particularly helpful in finding people who are reluctant to make their
identity known.

Therefore:

From the scenario it is clear that the researcher did not have a complete list of the
population. To find people who will possibly participate in the research project, the
researcher has to find a way of getting hold of these people. By asking the people who are
attending the support group to refer other people in the same situation to him/her, the
researcher builds up a sample. One person asks another to join in on the research and the
next person asks another one. This brings about a snowball effect.

If you read through the discussions of convenience, purposive and theoretical
sampling, you will understand why they are not correct. In convenience sampling the
researcher selects those elements that he or she can access easily. In purposive
sampling the researcher selects a sample that can be judged to be representative of
the total population, which is not possible in this case. Theoretical sampling is the
same as purposive or judgmental sampling and therefore option (3) is a red herring.

QUESTION 2

A researcher wishes to study Agoraphobia. The researcher places an advertisement in the
newspaper asking for participants. A total of 50 replies are received, of which the
researcher randomly selects 30. Only 15 participants actually turn up for their
appointment.

The problem with drawing a representative sample of participants with clinical conditions
such as agoraphobia is that …

(a) the participants who consent to participate may be unrepresentative of the target
population.
(b) no sampling strategies are appropriate for this research.
(c) no complete lists of sufferers’ names are usually available.
(d) the sample size is not an acceptable size for a representative sample.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aj107. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00  10x  sold
  • (3)
Add to cart
Added