100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Criminal Justice system revision notes R92,85   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Criminal Justice system revision notes

2 reviews
 57 views  4 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Notes from selected topics of my main CR1013 study notes. Extremely useful for an exam and recap. A plethora of statistics and useful information for evidence of said topics in the keywords section. Explanations are also included. Delivered in an easy-to-understand and memorise table brimming with ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • July 2, 2021
  • 10
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: bluescreenofdeath • 7 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: alexanderabrahart • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
CR1013 REVISION
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

WOMEN IN - The Corston report: (https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206102659/http:/www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/corston-report-march-2007.pdf)
PRISON
= Proportionately more women than men are remanded in custody. = Women with histories of violence and abuse are overrepresented in
the criminal justice system and can be described as victims as well as offenders. = Because of the small number of women’s prisons and
their geographical location, women tend to be located further from their homes than male prisoners, to the detriment of maintaining
family ties, receiving visits and resettlement back into the community. = 30% of women in prison lose their accommodation while in prison.
= The majority of female offenders have committed non-violent offences and present little risk to the public. Many present a far greater
risk to themselves. They have been recognised as more “troubled” than “troublesome”. = Around 70% of women coming into custody
require clinical detoxification compared with 50% of men. = The last decade has seen a dramatic rise in the numbers of women in prison
from an average of 1,560 in 1993 to an average of 4,500 in 2006. = Black and minority ethnic (BME) women for example, make up 28% of
the women’s prison population, over three times that in the general population. = There is an overuse of strip-searching in women’s
prisons which is humiliating and a dreadful invasion of privacy especially for women who have suffered past abuse, particularly
sexual abuse. = Women with histories of violence and abuse are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and can be described
as victims as well as offenders.



- Bromley Briefings (Halliday, 2021): (http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Bromley%20Briefings/Winter%202021%20Factfile%20final.pdf)

= On 15 January 2021 there were 3,130 women in prison in England and Wales.
= Most women entering prison to serve a sentence (77%) have committed a non-violent offence.
= More women are sent to prison to serve a sentence for theft than for violence against the person, robbery, sexual offences, fraud, drugs,
and motoring offences combined.
= Women released from prison are more likely to reoffend, and reoffend sooner, than those serving community sentences.#
= Nearly half of women (49%) left prison without settled accommodation—around one in 25 (4%) were sleeping rough on release in 2019–
20, and a further one in seven (14%) were classified as “other homeless”.
= More than seven in 10 women (71%) reported that they had a mental health problem compared with nearly half of men (47%).
= 53% of women in prison have survived emotional, physical, or sexual abuse during childhood.

, = 9/10 children have to leave home due to their mother’s imprisonment. = 7/10 women in prison are survivors of domestic abuse.
LAY - MAGISTRATES (THEME: FAIRNESS)
ADJUDICATION - MoJ, 2013: ( https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/266024/strengths-skills-judiciary-2.pdf )
= Users’ perceptions and observation data suggested that magistrates were more representative of the national working population
in terms of gender and ethnicity than District Judges. However, both magistrates and District Judges tend to be older compared to
the average working population.
= the concept of “fairness” was apparent in the interviews when respondents focused on the relative strengths of magistrates. Lay
involvement and the balance provided by having three people on the bench were cited as positive aspects in this respect.
= Magistrates’ perceived closeness to the local community was highlighted as a strength. Magistrates were believed to possess
specific knowledge of the area and to be aware of local needs.
= The concepts of “fairness” and “quality of justice” were recurring themes. A number of respondents cited the notion of “judgment
by peers” or “justice for the people, by the people”. Many also stressed that lay involvement within the Criminal Justice System was
crucial as it brought an element of democracy to proceedings and ensured that the system did not become too remote from the
public.
= Another strength highlighted was the broader “experience of life” that magistrates were seen to possess. Magistrates were
perceived to come from a wider cross section of society than District Judges and, therefore, believed to be better placed to bring
wider perspectives and sensitivities to the bench. Comparing published statistics on the gender and ethnicity of District Judges and
magistrates with that of the working population shows that the magistracy are more representative. (Judiciary of E&W, 2010).
= ^^^^ 51% of magistrates are female compared to 26% of district judge. 8% of magistrates were BME compared to 4% of district j.
= lack of younger and ethnically diverse magistrates. “You have to be able to sit for 26 days a year. That’s quite a lot to ask any
employer and so you might have to take annual leave which acts as a disincentive. You have to be time rich to be a magistrate, and
the people who are time rich are either money rich or retired. It’s always going to skew the type of people who can be magistrates.”
(Magistrate, London).
= The practice of sitting as a bench of three was also frequently cited as a key strength by most respondent groups. Again the notion
of “fairness” was mentioned, with a number of respondents claiming that this set-up, akin to a “mini-jury”, led to more balanced
decisions by controlling for any potential individual prejudice. This was felt to have potential benefits for defendants and lay users
who may feel reassured that verdicts or sentences were reached through discussion and a majority decision.
= The fact that magistrates required a Legal Adviser in court was perceived by some professional user groups to be a key
comparative weakness of the magistracy, given the additional resource this entailed. Some went further, noting that a bench was

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller phoenixfantasies. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R92,85. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57114 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R92,85  4x  sold
  • (2)
  Buy now