100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1&2 FOR 2021 CORRECT ANSWERS[FROM THE STUDY GUIDE AND TEXTBOOK] R50,00   Add to cart

Other

MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1&2 FOR 2021 CORRECT ANSWERS[FROM THE STUDY GUIDE AND TEXTBOOK]

 5 views  0 purchase

MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1&2 FOR 2021 CORRECT ANSWERS[FROM THE STUDY GUIDE AND TEXTBOOK]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • July 14, 2021
  • 3
  • 2020/2021
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (69)
avatar-seller
mashurugwi
MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 2021




Question 1

(i) The relevant case law for this question would be Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd
2015 (3) SA 1 (CC).


The facts of the scenario are similar to that of the Stratford case. In this case
the candidate attorney who represented the Investec bank furnished a copy of
the notice of motion and the founding affidavit to the Stratfords. She also
asked if they had a domestic employee to which the Stratfords replied yes
and she left a copy of the petition on the kitchen table. This was so that the
Stratfords could deliver it to their employee. They did not inform the candidate
attorney that they had two other domestic employees. The domestic
employees opposed the petition they contended that Investec failed to notify
the domestic employees of the sequestration proceedings, which then
amounted to a breach of their constitutional right to fair labor practices and
the right of access to courts. They submitted that, had they been given prior
notice of the provisional sequestration proceedings, they would have sought
legal assistance and opposed the application. The court then decided that
the petition had actually been served on the domestic employees because the
candidate attorney left the petition on the kitchen table and it would rather be
absurd to argue that the employees had not been served.


(ii) The relevant section in question would be section 9(4A) of the Insolvency Act
24 of 1936.


Section 9(4A)(a) provides: …“When a petition is presented to the court, the
petitioner must furnish a copy of the petition— (i) to every registered trade
union that, as far as the petitioner can reasonably ascertain, represents any

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mashurugwi. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00
  • (0)
  Buy now