100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PVL3703 SUMMARIES ENTIRE MODULE PVL3703 - Law of Delict R79,00
Add to cart

Other

PVL3703 SUMMARIES ENTIRE MODULE PVL3703 - Law of Delict

 27 views  1 purchase

Summaries of entire module beginning to end. Includes notes made during discussion classes.

Preview 4 out of 39  pages

  • September 7, 2021
  • 39
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (7)
avatar-seller
PetroB
The Law of Delict

UNIT 2 – General introduction

Define a delict.
• The act of a person which, in a wrongful and culpable way, causes harm to another.

Elements of a delict – All 5 elements/requirements must be present.
• Act
• Wrongfulness
• Fault
• Causation
• Harm/Damage

Plaintiff must prove all elements
Defendant has to eliminate only one

REMEDIES
1. Delictual remedy - Actions

Three actions – pillars of law of delict – classic delictual action
a. Patrimonial damages – damnum iniuria datum – reduction in financial position
Injury to personality – iniuria

• action legis Aquiliae –
o wrongful and culpable (intentional or negligent) causing patrimonial damages.
o Intention or negligence prove (fault)
• action iniuriartum –
o directed at satisfaction (solatium or sentimental damages) for wrongful and
intentional injury to personality.
o Intention must be proved (fault)
These two except for few exemption – cover whole are delictual liability.
• action for pain and suffering-
o wrongful and negligent (or intentional) impairment of bodily or physical-mental
integrity claimed.
o Intention or negligence proved (fault)

b. Liability without fault – other delictual action available


2. Delictual remedy – Interdict
o Not to recover loss already suffered
o Order to prevent harm,
o Prove two delictual elements: -
 Act already committed or will be,
 It is or will be wrongful.

,Delict and Breach of contract
Similarities
• Act of one person (contracting party)
• Wrongful and culpable act causing damage to another (contracting party)

Reasons for distinguishing/ differences
• Breach of contract constituted by: -
o Non-fulfilment by contractual party of contractual personal right or obligation to
perform.
o Primary remedy – enforcement, fulfilment, or execution of contract
o Claim for damages plays secondary role.
o Not formally treated as form of delict, part of contract law – specific rules and
remedies
• Delict constituted by: -
o Infringement of legally recognised interest of another party
o delictual remedies - primarily directed at damages.


Delict and Crime
Similarity
• Wrongful and culpable acts

Differences
• Crime: -
o Public law – upholding public interest.
o Criminal sanctions are of penal nature – intended to punish the criminal for
transgression again public interest.
• Delict: -
o Private law – protection individual interests
o Remedies – compensatory in character – compensating or indemnifying the
aggrieved party from harm wrongdoer caused.



Fundamental rights relevant to Law of Delict
• Right to property
• Right to life
• Right to freedom and security of the person – include right to bodily and psychological
integrity.
• Right to privacy
• Right to human dignity
• Right to equality
• Right to freedom of expression
• Right to freedom of religion, belief, and opinion
• Right to assembly, demonstration, picket, and petition
• Right to freedom of association
• Right to freedom of trade, occupation, and profession

,Chapter 2 of Constitution influence on law of Delict
Directly
Direct Vertical application – state must respect fundamental rights (may not infringe rights), except
insofar as the infringement is reasonable and justifiable in accordance with limitation clause
section 36.
Direct Horizontal application – courts must give effect to applicable fundamental right by applying,
where necessary, developing common law. Insofar as legislation does not give effect to the right.
Exercising value judgement, general principles in our law i.e., reasonableness or boni mores (legal
conviction of the community) criterion for delictual wrongfulness may serve prima facie indication
of reasonableness of a limitation in terms of the BoR.
When fundamental right is infringed or threatened, person is entitled to approach a competent
court.


Indirectly
All private law rules, principles and norms are subject to basic values of Ch 2 namely, promoting
spirit, purport and objects of the BoR. This will deliver the same results as direct application of
BoR. Applies to open-ended or flexible delictual principles. ie boni mores test for wrongfulness,
imputability test foe legal causation, reasonable person test for negligence and where policy
considers where reasonableness, fairness and justice plays a part.
Ch 2 can be implemented good results: - important policy considerations in determining.
• Wrongfulness
• Legal causation
• negligence

, UNIT 3 – General principles

1. Conduct or Act - ELEMENT
• A voluntary, human act or omission. - TEST

****Characteristics – NB NB
1. Act of human being
Animal act?
• Only where human uses animal as an instrument in the commission
• Human act till present
Juristic person
• May act through organs (humans) may be held delictual liable
o i.e. human conduct may be attributed to juristic person
o act performed by or ordered or with permission of director, official, servant of juristic
person
o in exercise of duties or functions in advancing or attempting to advance interests of
juristic person
o deemed to be performed by juristic person.

2. Performed voluntarily.
Voluntary conduct
Sufficient mental ability to control muscular movement
• Not mean must have willed or desired his conduct.
• Not mean conduct must be rational or explicable.
o Conduct by infants or mentally diseased persons are usually voluntary.
o May escape lacks accountability or fault.
• Claim not acted voluntarily – raises defence of automatism.
?? is willed always voluntary and visa versa??


3. Positive act (active conduct – commission) or omission – most important by
WRONGFULNESS
• Conduct can be commission or omission.
• Liability for omissions generally more restricted than a positive act.
• Law hesitant to find legal duty on someone to act positively to prevent damage to another.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller PetroB. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R79,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R79,00  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added