100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Law of Succession Lecture Notes & Summaries R221,00   Add to cart

Class notes

Law of Succession Lecture Notes & Summaries

 13 views  0 purchase

Comprehensive lecture notes, diagrams, explanations, brief case summaries etc.

Preview 4 out of 146  pages

  • November 16, 2021
  • 146
  • 2019/2020
  • Class notes
  • Jean wilke
  • All classes
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (26)
avatar-seller
attiyaomarjee
Succession Law

Lecture 1 – 12/02/20

 What is it? Legal rules that regulate the devolution of a deceased
person’s estate upon one or more persons.
 Rules:
o Who is entitled to succeed the deceased?
o Extent of benefits
 Administrative process of deceased estates
 Is it sterile and formalistic?
o Impacts extended family, those who choose not to marry,
same-sex couples, extramarital children, adopted children,
polygamous marriage spouses etc.
o Need to look at this law in a broader context, as it affects
multiple spheres of society.
 Succession takes place in 3 ways:
o Testate succession
o Intestate succession
o Contract/agreement – successio ex contractu/ pactum
sucessorium

Lecture 2

 Deceased Estate
o Not a legal person
 Individual, company or entity
 Legal rights
 Can sue/besued
 Own property
 Enter into contracts
o Cannot sue or be sued in its own name
o Executor must sue in his representative capacity
o Who owns the property between the death of the deceased
and transfer of ownership?
 Estate cannot own property = not a legal entity
 Does the heir own the property?
 Problematic = Universal Succession
o Does not exist in SA law = makes any heir
responsible for liabilities of the estate

, (not fair for children to bear your
burdens)
 BUT: Heir does have VESTED PERSONAL RIGHT
o Against executor to transfer ownership =
only then does the personal right
become a REAL RIGHT
o HEIR DOES NOT OWN BEFORE TRANSFER
 Executor will own the assets in his official
capacity during the admin period = LIMITED
OWNERSHIP (S102 of Deeds Reg. Act)
o BUT: SA law is not set on this =

Greenberg v Estate Greenberg

Facts: Husband and wife had joint will; husband dies; 3 sons and wife
surviving; property to go to sons and wife to have usufruct until her
death; sons died (had two descendants) = WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY?

Court held: Vesting took place upon testator’s death, subject to a
usufractory interests in favour of the widow = Beneficiary does not
obtain ownership of the property immediately on death of testator, but
obtains a vested right to claim delivery of the property from the
executor at some future date.

THEREFORE: Executor owns in official capacity during admin; heir
obtains vested personal right on death of testator.
- After estate has been administered (AND IF ASSETS > LIABILITIES)
= Executor will transfer assets (earliest moment of ownership)

 The Executor
o Admin. Estate Act
o Types: 1) Executor Testamentary (nominated in a valid will,
Master will appoint); 2) Executor Dative (testator did not
nominate, so Master will choose)
o Estate < R250 000 = Executor not chosen – somebody else
to dispense (S18(3) of AEA)
o Fiduciary position: Must act in good faith
 Will pay security fee if they act contrary
o Power of Assumption: Allows for executor to appoint co-
executor

, o If the wrong distribution has been made?
 Section 50 with S23(5) of AEA = Can recover
 If they refuse to return = Executor pays security
fee
o If executor refuses to institute proceedings to recover
estate debts or to make claims:
 Option 1: Remove executor from office (Cumes v
Estate Cumes)
 Application to HC
 Option 2: Beneficiary can sue, but executor can be
cited as the nominal defendant
 Du Toit v Vermeulen: Outlines general rule
 Gross v Pentz: Look at general rule, and
distinguish between 1) representative action
(gen. rule must follow = executor goes to court
on behalf of estate) and 2) direction action
(when executor acting in bad faith,
beneficiaries can act in their own interest to
seek relief)
 Option 3: Executor can cede the right of action to the
beneficiary (Elizabeth Nursing Home v Cohen And
Other)
 Adiation
o Acceptance of a benefit from the estate
o No formalities req = executor will transfer benefit
 Inferred from beneficiary’s conduct
o BUT: adiation will be req. in writing when an obligation is
attached to the benefit
 Repudiation
o Rejection of a benefit or refusal to inherit
o Must be done in writing = no benefit
o Why? Personal reasons, onerous condition attached to
inheritance, reverse a massing (two/more testators mass
the whole/part of their estates)
o Effect:
 Varies according to provisions of the will
 Provision for substitutes to inherit = direct
substitution
 Doctrine of Election:
o Benefit holds some kind of obligation

, o Beneficiary has to elect/choose to accept the benefit
 Accept = accept obligation
 CANNOT ADIATE PARTIALLY
 Repudiate = receive nothing
o ONLY APPLIES IF A BURDEN HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE
BENEFICIARY
 Partial/conditional repudiation:
o Not allowed if heir is put to an election on account of a
condition and there is no contrary intention in the will
o Allowed if NO CONDITION and the will does not prohibit it
 Can an insolvent person repudiate an inheritance?
o Wessels v De Jager
 When an inheritance becomes due and owing to an
insolvent, he acquires competence to inherit, but not
a right.
 Beneficiary may repudiate an inheritance.
 This does not cause prejudice to creditors.
 If beneficiary does not expressly or impliedly
accepted inheritance = does not form part of his
estate.
 Insolvent has limited capacity = retains right to accept
or reject the inheritance.
 Right does not pass to insolvent’s trustee

Death

o Traditional approach: A person is dead when the heart stops
beating and the lungs stop working.
o Modern medical approach: A person is dead when there is no
longer brain activity. (USED NOW)
o S v Williams (1986): When a person is kept alive artificially by
means of respirator, its eventual disconnection is not in legal
terms the act which causes death.
o Avoided question of whether or not brain death, in line with
medical science, should amount to legal death.




by
Unknown
Author is
licensed
under

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller attiyaomarjee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R221,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R221,00
  • (0)
  Buy now