Summary
Chapter 5 summary
- Course
- EKN 310
- Institution
- University Of Pretoria (UP)
Summary of 7 pages for the course EKN 310 at UP (Chapter 5 summary)
[Show more]
Seller
FollowContent preview
Chapter 5Equity and social welfare
Introduction:
Relevant implications from the two-sector model:
- A competitive economy producing the output mix at C will not necessarily yield the
most preferred distribution of income.
o May occur at point S.
- Policy-induced movement along the PPC (from C to S) will necessarily change the
distribution of income.
o Therefore, places one individual in a worse position compared to the other.
Quantity of good Y
M0 C
S
N0 Quantity of good X
Criteria for assessing welfare effects of public policy:
- Pareto criterion → implies that policy-induced change is justified only if it will
improve the well-being of at least one person without harming that of another.
o Focuses on individual welfare.
- Bergson criterion → allows for welfare improvement even if one or more individuals
are harmed in the process.
o Less strict than pareto criterion.
o Focuses on average welfare.
o Can harm individual welfare provided that societal welfare as a whole is not
harmed.
Nozick’s entitlement theory:
- Provides Pareto-based justification for redistributive policies aimed at redressing
past injustices.
Pareto criterion → associated with libertarian approach to public policy.
- Libertarian approach → individual freedom is the primary goal of the community.
o Maximisation of “negative freedom” or protection of the right to not be
forced by others. → exercising your right in a way that does not infringe those
of others.
Notes by Georgia Taylor EKN 310 1
, o Libertarians → opposed to distributional policies that infringe upon individual
freedom.
o Advocates a laissez faire system → governments role is reduced to the
responsibility of protecting individual freedom (caretaking role).
Nozick’s entitlement theory → exception to the libertarian rule
Principles of justice under entitlement theory:
1. Justice in acquisition → individuals are entitled to acquire things that do not belong
to others or do not place others in a worse position than before.
o Things = property and capital goods only.
o E.g house does not belong to anyone else when you acquire ownership of it
and nobody is worse off now that you own it.
2. Justice in transfer → material things can be transferred from individual to another on
a voluntary basis.
o E.g grants, gifts, bequests, and voluntary exchange
o Nobody is being forced to participate in the transaction.
3. Rectification of justice I holdings → redistribution of wealth is potentially justified only
if one or both of the above two principles have been violated.
o E.g you take a property that belonged to someone else, and they did not
consent to the transfer of you owning it.
The third principle is the only justification for a policy aimed at redistribution of resources
between individuals.
These principles formed a cornerstone of investigations undertaken by the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) → limited its focus to the apartheid era during which the
National Party was in power.
Other Pareto criteria:
Policies aimed at redistributing income from rich to poor people → justified on Pareto
grounds on basis of addressing externalities.
- High degree of inequality → poor impose negative externalities on the rich
o E.g high levels of poverty lead to high levels of crime and violence → these
undermine the quality of live of the rich.
o E.g lack of sanitation and other health-promoting services among the poor
can cause contagious diseases → threaten the health of the rich
o As a solution → the rich might transfer part of their income to the poor →
potentially reduces negative external effects impacting them.
o Government policies of redistribution: direct transfer payments or indirect
support by providing basic services etc.
- Insurance motive → individuals may view their tax payments as an inexpensive
means of insuring themselves against future loss of income or ill-health → see tax as
a superior and cheater alternative to private insurance.
o E.g if they become unemployed → they state will provide support for them
from the UIF.
o E.g if they become ill → they can receive care at a state-owned facility.
Notes by Georgia Taylor EKN 310 2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller georgiataylor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now