100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
The differences between Westphalian and Weberian States R109,00   Add to cart

Essay

The differences between Westphalian and Weberian States

 2 views  0 purchase

An in depth essay describing the differences between Weberian and Westphalian states.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • December 15, 2021
  • 4
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
All documents for this subject (17)
avatar-seller
saghaarwright
What are the fundamental differences between a Weberian and Westphalian State, and how did the
latter come about?
Saghaar Taghiyah Wright:
“Our object in the construction of the state is the greatest happiness of the whole, and not that of any one class,”
(Plato, 475:3). To discuss states in the context of international politics is to firstly, define them as the political
embodiment of the goals, ambitions, moral and ethical alignments of the people it represents, and secondly, as
well as most relevant to the content of this essay, recognise them as the primary actors within the environment
of international politics. If states exist as actors, then international politics is both the stage and the script, and to
understand one of these concepts, is to at least begin an understanding of the other. The primary concern of this
essay is to investigate if this connection extends to international politics and particularly, the Westphalian
theory of states, through a thorough exploration of the origins of the Westphalian state and its subsequent
effects upon the realm of international politics, with a secondary concern in further developing an understanding
of states, through a comparative analysis of the most popular conceptions of state (Weberian and Westphalian).

To proceed with the first aim of this essay, the Westphalian state, the system that it operates within (the modern
state system), as well as the theoretical attributes associated with both, are both named after, and created by, the
Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 (Stirk, 2015:3). This treaty came about as an end to the Thirty Years War, a war
of religion between the Catholics and the Protestants. As there was no clear victor, the ‘peace of Westphalia’
established jurisprudence that would be centered around avoidance of the conditions that lead to the Thirty
Years War, as well inadvertently creating the foundation of the modern international political system, a system
that dictated the practice of non-interference, personal sovereignty, and agency for nations, and sole power over
one's territory (Patton, 2019:2). To establish the link between this theory and the primary goal of this essay,
would be to emphasise that the conception of the Westphalian state (whose nuances will be explored further on
in this essay) in the Treaty of Westphalia, laid the framework for modern international diplomacy, was the first
attempt at codifying an international standard of practice for states to adhere to, and provided a basis on which
later international entities, such the United Nations or the European Union, to exist and interact with other
traditional states (Patton, 2019:3). Summarised?, the conception of the Westphalian state, was also the creation
of an international political system.

However, while the Westphalian state system certainly laid the groundwork for a version of international
politics, there exists much debate on whether said version of international politics can continually and
sustainably meet the needs of a rapidly developing international environment. International relations scholars
and academics have, of late, noted the diminished relevance of Westphalian principles, as states develop from
separate individuals to parts of a global entity, as a result of globalisation, global trade, and the creation of
global entities such as the United Nations that, to an extent, undermine state sovereignty (Lawson, 2017:5). It is
then, the conclusion of this author, that while states continue to act as agents in the field of international politics,

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller saghaarwright. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R109,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80467 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R109,00
  • (0)
  Buy now