100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
assignment 2 s1 2022 R153,00
Add to cart

Other

assignment 2 s1 2022

 7 views  0 purchase

Case summary assignment 2 for first semester 2022

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • March 9, 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (8)
avatar-seller
MrSekgobela
Module

Unique code

Student Number
Page | 1
Name & Surname



Assignment 2

Mans v Mans (CCT95/19) [2020] ZACC 09

Facts of the case

The case is about two married people who are Mrs Anita Mans(applicant) and Mr
Heinrich Mans(respondent) who got married out of community of property on 28
August 1993 which now want to divorce. The applicant drafted a document that
purported to be a postnuptial agreement (agreement) The terms of the agreement
were that the respondent would set aside the antenuptial contract; the applicant
would be entitled to half of his estate; and he would pay her maintenance.

There is a dispute between the parties about the circumstances that resulted in the
signing of the agreement. The respondent signed it to maintain peace in the house
for the sake of their minor daughter, he alleges. He also alleges that the signatures
of the applicant and witnesses were appended in his absence. The document was
signed on the morning of November 10, 2014, without hesitation or opposition from
the respondent, according to the applicant's story, which was verified by their little
daughter. The applicant further claims that she conveyed the document's
reasonableness to the respondent and the court.

The applicant discovered that the respondent had continued with an extra-marital
affair. She also uncovered an email from his attorney with a draft settlement
agreement attached to it which indicated a potential divorce action. The parties
thereafter continued to stay together as husband and wife, according to the
application. The respondent asked for divorce after being confronted. The
respondent filed a divorce summons, along with ancillary orders regarding the
parties' parental rights and responsibilities over their minor daughter. On behalf of
their daughter, the applicant filed a counterclaim seeking a divorce decree and child

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MrSekgobela. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R153,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R153,00
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added