PHIL 201 quiz 2
2021/2022
Liberty University coursehero answers
Complete solutions. Just paste the following:
1. Suppose that an argument applies a double standard without warrant. What would
that fallacy be called, according to our text?
2. Question 1
3. Propositions are evaluated accordin...
1. Suppose that an argument applies a double standard without warrant. What would
that fallacy be called, according to our text?
2. Question 1
3. Propositions are evaluated according to their
4. Question 2
5. A onetoone comparison between two or more things is:
6. Question 3
7. It is possible for an argument to be valid and all the premises to be false.
8. Question 4
9. A mixed hypothetical syllogism in which the premise denies the consequent is called:
10. Question 5
11. The Latin phrase that means ‘it does not follow’ is:
12. Question 6
13. Identify the fallacy: The Bible says we should do to others what we would have them to do for us.
14. Therefore I have no problem sharing the questions and answers of this quiz with another student.
15. Question 7
16. The fallacy of equivocation occurs when the meaning of a significant term changes in the middle of an
argument.
17. Question 8
18. This fallacy argues erroneously from the whole to each of the parts:
19. Question 9
, 20. This fallacy occurs when an argument is distorted to an extreme and becomes a false imitation of the
original argument:
21. Question 10
22. Slippery slope and straw man are really doing the same thing, just in a different order.
23. Question 11
24. One way to resolve the problem of conflicting authorities is to:
25. Question 12
26. The term for beliefs relating together in a way that is mutually supportive:
27. Question 13
28. Ad Hoc refers to:
29. Question 14
30. The two great enemies of good arguments are:
31. Question 15
32. A best explanation approach is often the best way to argue because many issues in philosophy do not
have perfect solutions.
33. Question 16
34. An argument where one gathers identical particular instances and arrives at a common conclusion:
35. Question 17
36. An argument may be evaluated as “true” or “false.”
37. Question 18
38. Type of argument that begins with a problem with an unknown explanation, forms a theory and tests
the theory.
39. Question 19
40. If you have enough evidence you can be logically certain of a conclusion arrived at inductively.
41. Question 20
42. Identify this kind of argument: If naturalism is true, then all things are determined and there is no free
will. If there is no free will then morality makes no sense. Therefore, if naturalism is true then morality
makes no sense.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Tutor23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R150,66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
