100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PVL3703 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 R399,99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PVL3703 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1

 385 views  2 purchases

PVL3703 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 QUESTION 1 John works in the control tower at the Takeflight Airport. He suffers from a rare disease that causes unexpected blackouts. However, he is on prescription medicine that effectively eliminates the possibility of the blackouts. On one...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 14  pages

  • May 24, 2022
  • 14
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • he i
All documents for this subject (108)
avatar-seller
LLBExampacksAndTutorials
QUESTION 1


John works in the control tower at the Takeflight Airport. He suffers
from a rare disease that causes unexpected blackouts. However, he
is on prescription medicine that effectively eliminates the possibility
of the blackouts. On one particular day, he does not take his
medicine. In the control tower, he has a blackout and is unable to
give the necessary instructions to departing and arriving aircraft. A
catastrophic aeroplane accident takes place during his blackout
because no instructions were forthcoming. A potential plaintiff
approaches you for a legal opinion. Write an opinion on the
question whether John’s behaviour qualified as conduct for the
purpose of delictual liability. (10)




Conduct is defined as a voluntary human act or omission. “Voluntary”
means that the person must be able to control his/her muscular
movements by means of his/her will. Body movements need not be willed
to be voluntary, nor do they need to be rational or explicable. The defence
of automatism excludes voluntariness, and this means that the relevant
movements were mechanical and the person could not control them by
his/her will. Factors that can induce a state of automatism include blackout
and epileptic fit.


According the Molefe v Mahaeng, the defendant does not bear the onus
to prove that he was in a stateof so-called sane automatism. The onus is
on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted voluntarily. If we apply
these principles to the facts supplied in the question, we can conclude that
X did not in fact act voluntarily when the damage to the car was caused.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R399,99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78252 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R399,99  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now