Class notes
State Violence
- Course
- Institution
Overview of State Violence for Violent Crime exam.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
serenfarrar
Content preview
State ViolenceWhat is State Violence?
Literally, it is the use of violence by the state
“Violence” can mean both its use and the threat of it
- Violence can be psychological too
- The literature uses the term “violence” to indicate other forms of non-physical
damage: symbolic violence, structural violence…
- Only physical and psychological violence
“The state” is an entity composed of several sectors and organisations
- Police forces
- Armed forces
- Judiciary branch
- Prison system
Use of Violence by the State
State and violence are inseparably linked
The most popular and commonly accepted definition of the state was written by Max
Weber in 1919:
- The state is the “only human community within a certain territory that claims the
monopoly on the use of legitimate physical force.” (Weber 2015, 136)
The monopoly on (legitimate) violence is a state’s fundamental element!
The state decides on the laws within a particular territory and then enforces them,
through police forces and the criminal justice system
The state can also defend its monopoly against external and internal competitors,
through the armed forces and the police
- Internal & external sovereignty
The use of violence underlies a state’s fiscal capacity
The use of force effectively allows the extraction of taxes from individuals living in
the state’s territory
Without use of force, some (or most?) people would probably not pay taxes and the
state would not gather as many resources as it does now
Historical Relations between State + Violence
The link between state and violence is apparent when looking at modern history
States have been built through violence, and more precisely through war-making
(Tilly 1985)
Violence had the double effect of helping to impose state rule on a territory and
forcing the state to establish armies, bureaucracies, and taxation
Modern states emerge in Western Europe in the 1500s, and since then they have
used violence and other means to achieve a territorial monopoly on the use of
violence
At the same time, states have spread from Europe to the rest of the world through
imperialism and emulation
The whole surface of the world now belongs to states
This makes state violence a pervasive feature of life
, State Violence + State Crime
In most cases, the state gets to define what constitutes crime and what does not
How likely it is that the state will prosecute itself?
Remember though that the state is not a unitary actor – it is made up of several
organisations…
- … some of which may have an interest in accusing and prosecuting the others
Who can accuse a state of committing a (violent) crime?
- International society (other states, the international community in general)
- Civil society
- NGOs (Amnesty International, Transparency International, Human Rights
Watch…)
Legitimate State Violence?
The issue of “legitimacy” is also fundamental in deciding whether a state committed
a crime
Weber: the state possesses a monopoly on the legitimate use of force
If an act of violence is deemed legitimate, it will be considered as permissible and
just – and thus it will not be considered as a crime
Where does legitimacy come from?
- Self-defence: the state was defending itself from foreign aggression
- Democracy: state officials answer to the people
- Human rights: the state uses violence compatibly with the respect of
fundamental human rights
- Culture: the state represents a community bound by common language, history,
and culture (nation-state)
Who decides on legitimacy?
Two main options:
- External audience: the international community
- Internal audience: the public opinion + the state itself (for example, its judiciary
branch)
As a general rule, three main activities involving violence are considered legitimate
uses of force (Green and Ward 2009, 164)
- Policing (self-explanatory, although police overreach and/or militarisation are
real concerns)
- Punishment (and so the operation of the judiciary branch and the prison system)
- Warfare (and so the operation of the armed forces)
This doctrine is universal by nature and is enshrined in several fundamental
international legal documents (such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights)
Notice however that this doctrine can be instrumentalised and is not closely applied
by the international community
- “Exporting democracy” …
- China in the UN Human Rights Council…
State Violence Now
Every part of the world belongs to a state
Some states are much less functional than others (“failed states”, “ungoverned
areas”)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller serenfarrar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R105,42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now