100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Easements - Answer Outline for Problem Questions R143,96   Add to cart

Class notes

Easements - Answer Outline for Problem Questions

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Easements - Answer Outline for Problem Questions

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • June 16, 2022
  • 4
  • 2018/2019
  • Class notes
  • Jane bryan
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Easements – Problem Questions

1) Identify possible easements

- Positive easement – giving someone the right to do something over another’s land
(walk across land)

- Negative easement – allowing someone to receive something from another’s land
(light, air etc)

- Profit à prendre – allowing someone to go onto another’s land to take natural
produce (apples, wild flowers)
o Focus on whether it has been acquired, not if it exists in law


2) Can the alleged right be an easement? Re-Ellenborough Park test – outline all at the
start of answer and refer back to them on the facts

 Is there a dominant and servient tenement?
 Is there diversity of ownership?
o You cannot enjoy an easement over your own land; would be a quasi-
easement – Roe v Siddons
 Does the right accommodate the dominant tenement?
o Right must be sufficiently connected to and benefit the land, not the owner
personally
o Does it increase the value of the land? Is it a commercial advantaged
connected to the normal use and enjoyment of land?
o Hill v Tupper – Exclusive right to put pleasure boats on a canal for profit was
not sufficiently connected to the land
o Moody v Steggles – Hanging an advertisement sign above neighboring land
was a recognized easement because it benefited the pub located on the
dominant tenement
 Is the right capable of being the subject matter of a grant?
o Capable grantor and grantee?
o Is the right sufficiently definite? Impossible easements:
 Right to wander freely over land – Re Ellenborough Park
 Right to protection from weather – Philips v Pears
 Right to a good view – Aldred’s case
 Right to privacy – Browne v Flower
 Right to a good TV signal – Hunter v Canary Wharf
o Is the right analogous to an existing easement?
 New easements permitted reluctantly if needed to keep up with social
change
 TV signal in 1997 maybe not viewed as essential but today, a
good phone and WIFI signal might/should be
o Does the right place a positive burden on the servient owner?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anoukageene. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R143,96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R143,96
  • (0)
  Buy now