100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Covenants - Answer Outline for Problem Questions R110,87   Add to cart

Class notes

Covenants - Answer Outline for Problem Questions

 8 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

How to answer problems questions on covenants? Outline of answer

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • June 16, 2022
  • 3
  • 2018/2019
  • Class notes
  • Jane bryan
  • Covenants
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Restrictive Covenants – Problem Questions – Answer Outline



*LOOK OUT FOR THE WORDS COVENANT(ED)(S)*



1) Who are the landowners concerned in the scenario?
- If not the original parties to the covenant, it must be considered whether the benefit
and the burden have passed to the current landowners (no more privity of contract)
- Identify original parties and their successors in title
*note whether it is clear on the facts if the land is registered or unregistered – relevant
for passing of the burden*


2) Has the burden passed? - Tulk v Muxhay test
- Is the covenant negative in nature?
o Does it require the covenantor to “put his hand in his pocket” in order to
comply with it? Haywood v Brunswick Permanent
- Does the covenant accommodate the dominant tenement - can’t merely be a
personal one and can’t exist in gross?
- Did the original covenantor intend for the burden to run with the land?
o Implied by virtue of S.79 of LPA25, if no evidence to the contrary
- Does the current owner have notice of the covenant?
o Must be registered as a notice on Charges Register if registered land
o Must be a D(ii) class on Land Charge if not registered land

- Positive burdens – do not pass with the land unless a conveyancing device has been
used – Rhone v Stephens
o There is a chain of indemnity covenants
o There is a direct covenant with a promise to impose the same obligation of
direct covenant in turn on his successor
o There is an estate rent charge
o There is a doctrine of mutual benefit and burden agreement

3) Has the benefit passed?
- Express annexation – Rogers v Hosegood explicit wording
- Statutory annexation by virtue of S.78 of LPA 25, following Federated Homes v Mill
Lodge Properties
- Crest Nicholson v McAllister – Yes Federated Homes but wording should clearly
identify dominant tenement
- Assignment?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anoukageene. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R110,87. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R110,87  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now