The criteria statements are numbered 1 to 30, and the rating points are 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Rating Scale Description
1 criterion is not met at all
2 or 3 if the criterion is satisfied partially
2 if the partial fulfilment of the criterion is closer to 1 than it is to 4
/ the criterion is closer to not being met than to being met
/meets some criteria partially, but information is still largely not met
3 if the partial fulfilment of the criterion is closer to 4 than it is to 1
/the criterion is closer to not being met than to being met
/Meets criteria partially, but not quite fully
4 criterion is met fully
Please see descriptions of review criteria below:
Relevant: A description is relevant if
(a) it concerns the essay topic, and
(b) it does not include information about other topics (e.g. content that belongs in other sections, or is
not relevant to the assignment topic)
Sufficient: A description is sufficient if it raises at least 4 or 5 correct points about the topic
Well-formed: A description is well-formed if it is presented clearly and logically
, Review criteria:
Number Criteria 1 2 3 4
1 The assignment is submitted as an essay
2 The essay is no longer than two pages (excluding list of
references)
3 The essay includes a discussion of a FOC approach and the role
of the psychologist
4 The FOC approach and the role of psychologist is relevant
5 The FOC approach and the role of psychologist is sufficient
6 The FOC approach and the role of psychologist is well-informed
7 The essay includes a discussion of a SOC approach and the role
of psychologist
8 The SOC approach and the role of psychologist is relevant
9 The SOC approach and the role of psychologist is sufficient
10 The SOC approach and the role of psychologist is well-informed
11 The essay includes first order change as a FOC concept
12 The essay includes second order change as a FOC concept
13 The first order change discussion is relevant
14 The first order change discussion is sufficient
15 The first order change discussion is well-informed
16 The second order change discussion is relevant
17 The second order change discussion is sufficient
18 The second order change discussion is well-informed
19 The essay includes a discussion on perturbation
20 The essay describes perturbation as a SOC concept
21 The perturbation discussion is relevant
22 The perturbation discussion is sufficient
23 The perturbation discussion is well-informed
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller PerfectionistNotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R0,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.