Summary
Summary UNISA ASSISTANCE
- Course
- LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Summary of 11 pages for the course LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence at Unisa (FULL EXAM PACK)
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
LEV3701/201/1/2022Tutorial Letter 201/1/2022
Law of Evidence
LEV3701
Semester 1
Department of Criminal and Procedural Law
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
This tutorial letter contains important
information about your module.
Define tomorrow.
, LEV3701/201/1/2022
CONTENTS
1. FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT 01/2022
2. FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT 02/2022
3. PREPARATION FOR THE EXAMINATION
4. BEST WISHES
Dear Student
Please note that this tutorial letter contains feedback on the assignments for the first
semester. It also contains important information about the examination in May/June 2022.
1. FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT 01/2022
Question 1.1
This question required a full discussion of sections 195 and 196 of the Criminal Procedure
Act 51 of 1977 – see Learning Unit 5 in the study guide. Note that section 195 of the
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 has to some extent been amended by section 68 of the
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007. In terms
of section 196 of the CPA, the spouse of an accused is a competent as well as
compellable witness in defence of that accused. However, if the accused is jointly charged
with someone else, the spouse of such accused will be competent to give evidence on
behalf of that co-accused but cannot be compelled to do so.
It was also necessary to fully discuss marital privilege with reference to the facts of the
question. Marital privilege entitles a spouse to refuse to disclose communications from the
other spouse made during the marriage – see Learning Unit 15 in the study guide. Please
note that this question required a discussion with reference to both the prosecution and the
defence.
Question 1.2
Please note that this question required a discussion with reference to both the prosecution
and the defence – see Learning Unit 5 in the study guide.
Witness for the prosecution
A co-accused is not a competent witness for the state, whether to prove the case against
himself or against the accused, because he is also an accused. There may, however, be
circumstances where the state may call someone, who had previously been a co-accused,
to testify. This happens when this person is no longer a co-accused in that case. It can
happen in one of the following four ways:
• By withdrawing the charge against the co-accused.
• By finding the co-accused not guilty.
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller neelamdawakee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
50064 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now