Exam (elaborations)

LCR4805 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2022 - UNISA ( WITH DETAILED FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY)

0 purchase

Course
LCR4805

Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)

Book
Principles of Evidence

LCR4805 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2022 - UNISA ( WITH DETAILED FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY) Assessment 1 Gloria is stopped by traffic officers at a roadblock. One traffic officer tries to solicit a bribe from Gloria. She refuses, and as a result the traffic officer gives Gloria a stiff...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 31, 2022
Number of pages 5
Written in 2022/2023
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

lcr4805 assignment 1 memo semester 2 2022 unisa with detailed footnotes and a bibliography
gloria is stopped by traffic officers at a roadblock one traffic officer tries to solicit a bribe f

LLBExampacksAndTutorials Member since 6 year 5090 documents sold

138

Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2021.

LCR4805
Selected Private and Criminal Law Principles
of the Internet

ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO
SEMESTER 2 - 2022
Unique number: - DUE: 31 AUGUST 2022

DOCUMENT PREVIEW
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography

Gloria is stopped by traffic officers at a roadblock. One traffic officer tries to solicit a bribe from
Gloria. She refuses, and as a result the traffic officer gives Gloria a stiff penalty for something
insignificant. Gloria’s friend Kate, who is sitting in the passenger seat, captures the entire incident
on video with her cell phone. Gloria lays a charge of corruption at the local police station.

Can this cell phone video recording be used as evidence in a court of law? Discuss in detail. [30]

Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.

PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 084 591 8661 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za

, LCR4805 ASSIGNMENT 1

QUESTION

Assessment 1
302230

Gloria is stopped by traffic officers at a roadblock. One traffic officer tries to solicit a
bribe from Gloria. She refuses, and as a result the traffic officer gives Gloria a stiff
penalty for something insignificant. Gloria’s friend Kate, who is sitting in the passenger
seat, captures the entire incident on video with her cell phone. Gloria lays a charge of
corruption at the local police station.

Can this cell phone video recording be used as evidence in a court of law? Discuss in
detail. [30]

Schmidt1 was the first to argue that the products of modern technology should not be forced
into the limited categories of either real or documentary evidence. To support his argument, he
pointed out that the existing rules in respect of discovery, reliability and authenticity were
originally based on paper documentation, but have occasionally been extended by additions
to cater for photography, cinematography, magnetic audio and video tapes, and the computer.

Zeffert2 argue that videotapes should be treated as documentary evidence. This was also the
view of the court in S v Ramgobin3. Other cases have, however, preferred the argument that
videotapes should be regarded as real evidence (S v Mpumlo4, S v Baleka5, S v Nieuwoudt6).
Photographs may constitute either real or documentary evidence. A photograph will be real
evidence when the physical photograph itself is central to the case, for example,

- it has fingerprints on the surface, or

- it is a very rare historical photograph which was stolen from a museum, or

1 Schmidt & Rademeyer Law of Evidence (2014).
2 Zeffertt & Paizes The South African Law of Evidence 2 ed (2009).
3 S v Ramgobin and Others 1986 (4) SA 117 (N) 146.
4 S v Mpumlo and Others 1986 (3) SA 485 (E).
5 S v Baleka and Others (3) 1986 (4) SA 1005 (T) 1021D.
6 S v Nieuwoudt (4) 1985 (4) SA 519 (C) 522B.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R249,99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

LCR4805 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2022 - UNISA ( WITH DETAILED FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY)

Document information

Subjects

Connected book

More summaries for

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview