This document is based on the lecture slides, as well as what was said in lectures and aspects of the readings. It covers all Term 3 work which focuses on Foreign Policy Analysis internationally and within South Africa. It goes into depth, contains diagrams, and asks questions that the lecturer sta...
APPROACHES IN FPA:
- 1. Levels of analysis
- 2. Theoretical frameworks
FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS AS A SUBFIELD IN I.R.:
Foreign policy analysis is a sub-field in I.R. and therefore, reflects intellectual traditions and
trends of IR.
- See this: the same frameworks that dominate IR, dominate FPA as well.
- Also, similar debates and issues concerning epistemology, methodology, and the roles
of values.
- One can also class these approaches in terms of IR’s major perspectives:
o Realism
o Liberal-pluralism
o Critical perspective.
ONE KEY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO:
- Prevailing levels of analysis
- IR is state-centric and focuses on state-level of systemic explanations
- FDA encompasses analysis at these levels:
o Micro (individual)
o Meso (domestic context) Over the term, we look at
each of these levels in depth.
o Macro (systemic)
However, in the meantime, here is a brief summary of these levels of analysis…
,MICRO:
- Looks at the role of the individual leadership in foreign policy
- Analyses the psychology, cognition, and personality of the leader
o These are the variables in the analysis.
- Known as the study of foreign policy decision-making (FPDM)
o Explains the process of decision-making according to the attributes of the
leader
o can also help predict what the leader will decide for a certain policy.
MESO:
- looks at the domestic context and determinants of foreign policy.
o “What happens within the state at a domestic level?”
- E.g.:
o The role of domestic policies or public opinion
o Role of domestic interest groups
▪ Do these groups play a role in FPA (such as COSATU)
o Role of bureaucracies in foreign decision making
o Also, look at democracies and the government ministers (and their decisions)
MESO:
- Looks at how foreign policies are shaped by systemic factors
- Explains foreign policy as an outcome of:
o Power state distribution in international systems
o State attributes
o State (national) interests
The question of agency and structure is different depending on the level of analysis.
,In chronological terms, FPA was first dominated by insights of realism and neo-realism
(i.e., macro-perspectives).
- IR has some classical perspectives which were an invention of the 20th century.
- Especially shaped by:
o Morgenthau (Politics Among Nations)
o Waltz (Man, the State and War)
o Kissinger (American Foreign Policy)
▪ Through them we see the emergence of IR and FPA and thus, we can
see why realism is the dominant viewpoint and perspective.
REALISM: - power politics
- Foreign politics is determined by 2 factors:
o 1. Maintaining the balance of power (especially seen in the Cold War and
MAD)
▪ “don’t hurt what you can’t kill”
▪ Seek alliances to maintain power.
o 2. Always serve the national interest first
▪ Ideology is important, but so is pragmatism.
NEO-LIBERALISM:
- Power rivalries is a function of the national and international system
o = anarchy (no dominant power)
- Therefore, foreign politics should accommodate relative distributions of power in the
world.
o States maximize their power vis-à-vis other states
▪ Foreign politics should reflect this.
“BILLARD BALL” VIEW OF POLITICS:
FP can result in state actors deliberating how
State A they can maximize gains and minimize cost =
Contex utility maximization.
State C
Contex Realism: real-sum game
State B Liberalism: positive-sum game
Contex
, ARGUMENTS AGAINST REALISM:
Later on, schools began to criticise assumptions and claims of realism
From the view of FP, these were the arguments that were made:
1. The behaviourist application does not give satisfactory explanations
- Behaviourism focuses on measurable and observable things
o = Foreign policy is the output (acts or decisions).
▪ However, this does give a full explanation of what is happening
in the world.
- Hence the question, what about the things that are not accounted for?
o Intangibles in foreign policy decision-making
▪ E.g., the role of the leader’s personality or psych.
- Also important to study the process, and not merely the output of foreign
policy decisions.
2. Critique of rationality/rational actor model
- Who’s to say that states are rational actors driven by utilitarian (cost-benefit)
considerations?
3. It’s important to unpack the black box of foreign policy decision-making:
- Bureaucracies and ministries of foreign politics
- Executive vs. legislative vs. judicial authority
- Interest groups, public opinion, media
- Psychological and cognition
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller camrynnieuwstad. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R120,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
