100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Judgement in managerial decision making - summary R205,65   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Judgement in managerial decision making - summary

 3 views  0 purchase

Judgement in managerial decision making - summary Judgement in managerial decision making - summary Judgement in managerial decision making - summary Judgement in managerial decision making - summary Judgement in managerial decision making - summary Judgement in managerial decision making - su...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • February 14, 2023
  • 6
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (12)
avatar-seller
Kartz
Judgement in managerial decision making - summary

Which of the following is not likely to produce escalation of commitment?
A present decision that is likely to generate further losses.
When deciding whether or not to escalate commitment to a chosen course of action, our
choice should depend on:
The expected value of further investment.

The tendency to escalate commitment is more pronounced when:
The commitment is to a failed decision made by oneself.
The failure of the initial commitment can be explained with a causal, unrelated account.
The escalation is made by an individual, compared with escalation made by a group.
Answer: All of the above.
Which is not a good mechanism for protecting oneself from irrational escalation of
commitment?
Identify reasons for justifying the initial course of action, in order to avoid the creation of
cognitive dissonance, which ultimately leads to irrational escalation of commitment.
Which of the following is a useful advice for a competing party that wishes to avoid
competitive escalation of commitment?
Pursue mutual disclosure of intentions between you and your competitor.
Specific actions of parties engaged in competitive irrationality are:

Not easily identified as irrational.
Which of the following best describes non-rational escalation of commitment?
Commitment to a previous course of action beyond the point prescribed by rational models of
decision making.

Which of the following is an underlying mechanism of escalation of commitment?
Self-justification.
A department manager has personally decided to hire a new employee. This employee's
performance, however, proves to be below expectations. Nevertheless, the manager decides
to keep the employee, explaining away his current performance as merely part of the
learning process. This escalation of commitment may be due to:

, Perceptual biases.
Judgmental biases.
Impression management.
Answer: All of the above
True or False: In a competitive auction, continuing to bid after both one and one's
competitors have started bidding is considered irrational escalation of commitment.
False

True or False: The confirmation trap is a primary underlying bias of escalation of
commitment.
True
True or False: Escalation of commitment is more pronounced in simultaneous decisions than
in serial decisions.
False
Businesses that adjust their prices upward in response to high demand, consistent with
economic laws of supply and demand, can experience which of the following outcomes:
Underperform other businesses that consider the norms of fairness.
Are punished by customers who are more sensitive to fairness than to economic rationality.
Make larger profit than businesses that comply with norms of fairness.
Answer: All of the above
Which of the following condition can increase one's willingness to engage in altruistic
punishment?
When the person who is treated unfairly belongs to an in-group.
People display inconsistency by:
Preferring a nominal wage increase that does not cover inflation over a wage cut.

Which bias underlies the tendency of people to over-claim credit for their contribution to an
outcome?
The affect heuristic
Time discounting
Self-serving attributions
Answer: None of the above
Which of the following helps to eliminate the influence of fairness considerations?
Repeating games

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Kartz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R205,65. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R205,65
  • (0)
  Buy now