100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Week 5 R50,00
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Week 5

 189 views  0 purchase

Summary of 5 pages for the course Company Law CML2001 at UCT (Complete summary)

Preview 1 out of 5  pages

  • August 17, 2016
  • 5
  • 2016/2017
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (11)
avatar-seller
UCTstudent
Week 5: Governance and Accountability

PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL
 Metaphorical veil drawn between company and its
shareholders/directors once it is incorporated – this is what gives them
limited liability. You cannot hold those behind the veil liable, only the
company.
 Possible for this veil to be “pierced” in exceptional circumstances – the
separate entity is disregarded but this is an exceptional remedy, there
must be clear abuse.
 “Separate existence remains a figment of law, liable to be curtailed or
withdrawn when the objects of their creation are abused or thwarted.”
(i.e. limited liability is a courtesy)

Definition: In certain circumstances, the law will withdraw the right of
separate legal personality and hold insiders liable by disregarding the
company’s separate existence (always start with this)

Two types of veil piercing
(Can claim in the alternative but must ask the court for help)
1. Common law – don’t have to prove unconscionable abuse
- Look at Cape Pacific case
- Fraud is relevant but not essential
- Examples of abuse of SLP
 SLP was used as a device by a director to evade fiduciary
duties
 SLP was used to overcome a contractual duty
2. Statutory (Companies Act 2008) – have to prove unconscionable
abuse
- “Whenever a court, on application by an interested person, or in
any proceedings in which a company is involved, finds that the
incorporation of, or any act by or on behalf of, or any use of, that
company constitutes an unconscionable abuse of the juristic
personality of the company as a separate entity, the court may
declare that the company is to be deemed not to be a juristic
person in respect of such rights, obligations or liabilities of the
company….. and the court may give such further order or orders as
it may deem fit in order to give effect to such declaration.”

Court has no general discretion simply to disregard the existence of a
separate corporate identity whenever it is just or convenient to do so – must
look at substance over form.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UCTstudent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

51036 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Start selling
R50,00
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added