100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Essay HRM2604 - Performance Management Practices - Assignment 3 R100,00
Add to cart

Essay

Essay HRM2604 - Performance Management Practices - Assignment 3

2 reviews
 208 views  4 purchases

HRM2604 Assignment 3 Semester 1 2023

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • March 30, 2023
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
  • hrm2604 assignment 3
  • ide
All documents for this subject (22)

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: charmaineadamson • 1 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: ChrisHarrow • 1 year ago

Thank you for your feedback

review-writer-avatar

By: gibsonmodise • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
ChrisHarrow
The following is Assignment 3 for HRM2604.
Please note plagiarism is a punishable offence, edit and paraphrase assignment to avoid
plagiarism.


Abstract
1.1.Was performance feedback evident in the scenario? Discuss the importance of Naveen
providing his employees with performance feedback. (4)
No it was not evident.
According to Aguinis (2013)
Feedback is important in that it provides improved performance at all levels. Thus, having
information on one’s performance, if paired with a good developmental plan, is likely to
lead to performance improvement……..

, 1.2.Determine and explain the outcomes of a poorly implemented PM system evident at
Naveen’s restaurant. (8)
Chose only eight.
i. Increased turnover. If the process is not seen as fair, employees may become upset and
leave the organization. They can leave physically (i.e., quit) or withdraw psychologically
(i.e., minimize their effort until they are able to find a job elsewhere).
ii. Use of misleading information. If a standardized system is not in place, there are multiple
opportunities for fabricating information about an employee’s performance.
iii. Lowered self-esteem. Self-esteem may be lowered if feedback is provided in an
inappropriate and inaccurate way. This, in turn, can create employee resentment.
iv. Wasted time and money. Performance management systems cost money and quite a bit of
time. These resources are wasted when systems are poorly designed and implemented.
v. Damaged relationships. As a consequence of a deficient system, the relationship among the
individuals involved may be damaged, often permanently.
vi. Decreased motivation to perform. Motivation may be lowered for many reasons, including
the feeling that superior performance is not translated into meaning tangible (e.g., pay
increase) or intangible (e.g., personal recognition) rewards.
vii. Employee burnout and job dissatisfaction. When the performance assessment instrument is
not seen as valid and the system is not perceived as fair, employees are likely to feel
increased levels of job burnout and job dissatisfaction. Therefore, employees are likely
to become increasingly irritated.
viii. Increased risk of litigation. Expensive lawsuits may be filed by individuals who feel they
have been appraised unfairly.
ix. Unjustified demands on managers’ and employees’ resources. Poorly implemented systems
do not provide the benefits provided by well-implemented systems, yet they take up
managers’ and employees’ time. Such systems will be resisted because of competing
obligations and allocation of resources (e.g., time). What is sometimes worse, managers
may simply choose to avoid the system altogether, and employees may feel increased
levels of overload?
x. Varying and unfair standards and ratings. Both standards and individual ratings may vary
across and within units and be unfair.
xi. Emerging biases. Personal values, biases, and relationships are likely to replace
organizational standards.
xii. Unclear ratings system. Because of poor communication, employees may not know how
their ratings are generated and how the ratings are translated into rewards.

1.3.Explain which two operational challenges related to aligning a PM system and
business strategy manifested at Naveen’s restaurant. Substantiate your answer with
evidence from the scenario. (6)
Individual, team and organisational performance is aligned resulting in poor integrated
performance throughout the organisation (good individual and team performance lead to
overall organisation performance).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ChrisHarrow. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R100,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R100,00  4x  sold
  • (2)
Add to cart
Added