Other
assignment answers
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Get assignment answers and put them on your pass. Do not plagiarise
[Show more]
Content preview
PVL3704 ASSIGNMENT 1SEMESTER 1 2023
[Document subtitle]
Question 1
Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the
plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law.
Answer
The rationale behind the concept of unjust enrichment is that one individual shouldn't be permitted to
profit at the expense of another without a compelling legal justification. One of the conditions for a
plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim against a defendant is that the defendant's enrichment must have
come at the expense of the plaintiff
, Question 1
The rationale behind the concept of unjust enrichment is that one individual shouldn't be
permitted to profit at the expense of another without a compelling legal justification. One
of the conditions for a plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim against a defendant is that the
defendant's enrichment must have come at the expense of the plaintiff.
As a result of the defendant's enrichment, the plaintiff must have experienced some sort
of harm or loss. The plaintiff must demonstrate that there has been a value transfer from
them to the defendant and that this has resulted in the defendant's enlargement, as the
South African courts have highlighted.
According to the court's ruling in the case of ABSA Bank v. Bond Equipment (Pty) Ltd, it
must be proven that there has been a transfer of value from the plaintiff to the defendant
for a claim of unjust enrichment to succeed. The law of unjust enrichment is concerned
with the transfer of property from one person to another, according to the court, which
noted that "enrichment and harm are two sides of the same coin1
In a case similar to this one, Minister of Finance v. Gore, the court determined that in
order for a claim of unjust enrichment to succeed, it must be demonstrated that the
plaintiff has suffered a loss or harm and that the defendant has profited as a result. The
transfer of assets from one person to another without legal explanation is referred to as
"unjust enrichment," according to the court.2
Academic authors' perspectives
The requirement that the defendant's enrichment must have been at the expense of the
plaintiff in a claim for unjust enrichment has been discussed by a number of scholarly
authors in addition to the South African case law.
According to Professor Dale Hutchinson's book, "Unjust Enrichment in South African
Law," the law of unjust enrichment is fundamentally based on the transfer of property,
1 ABSA Bank Ltd. v Bond Equipment (Pretoria) (Pty) Ltd. (580/98) [2000] ZASCA 59; 2001 (1) SA 372
(SCA)
2 Minister of Finance and others v Gore NO 2007 (1) SA 111 (SCA).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gadzesano. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R163,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
78600 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now