This document contains four case summaries applicable to Prof Botha's part of the work:
AZAPO v President of RSA
First Certification Judgement
New National Party of SA
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Interim Constitution: committed to transition to a more just, defensible and democratic
political order based on protection of fundamental HRs
This could not be achieved without a proper commitment to reconciliation and national
unity
Epilogue to Constitution: “in order to facilitate reconciliation, amnesty shall be granted in
respect of acts, omissions and offences associated with political objectives. Parliament
under this Constitution shall adopt a law providing for the mechanisms, criteria and
procedures, including tribunals, through which such amnesty shall be dealt with”
o In 1995 Parliament enacted Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act
(“Truth and Reconciliation Act”); Act established TRC
o Objective of TRC: promote national unity and reconciliation; create a complete as
possible picture of the causes, nature and extent of HR violations; take into account
perspective of victims and persons responsible
o TRC (Committee on Amnesty) gave amnesty to those who made full disclosure of all
the relevant facts relating to acts committed with a political objective
S 20(7) of the Act: no person who has been granted amnesty in respect of an act, omission
or offence shall be criminally or civilly liable, and neither the State nor any
body/organisation will be vicariously liable
o Constitutionality of s 20(7) is at issue in this case: its consequences are not
authorised by the Constitution
o S 20(7) is in conflict with s 22 of the Constitution: “right to have justiciable disputes
settled by a court of law, or another independent or impartial forum”
o Applicants: Amnesty Committee ≠ ‘court of law’ or ‘independent or impartial forum’;
not authorised to settle ‘justiciable disputes’ – all that it could decide was whether
amnesty should be granted
Effect of amnesty: impacts upon fundamental rights (right to obtain redress when rights are
invaded; guilty persons are answerable before the courts)
Legal question: does the Constitution permit the violation of s 22 by s 20(7) of the Act?
o Is there a provision in the Constitution which permits a limitation on s 22, or if not,
can a limitation on s 22 be justified i.t.o. s 33(1)?
Respondents argued that epilogue of Constitution is the provision which authorises any law
conferring amnesty
Necessary to deal with constitutional status of the epilogue (is it a “provision” of the
Constitution?)
o S 232(4) of the Constitution: a provision in any Schedule to this Constitution shall not
by reason only of the fact that it is contained in a Schedule, have a lesser status than
any other provision of this Constitution
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 19kasia95. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
