Summary of *SOME* of the reading materials for the final exam (2023) for Global Security. INCLUDES
notes from (Total: 23 pages):
● Paul D. Williams and Matt McDonald’s textbook (3rd edition, 2018) “Security Studies: An
Introduction”, introduction and chapters 9, 12,13, 18, 27 and 28.
● Ole Wæver and Barry Buzan’s chapter “27 After the Return to Theory. The Past, Present and
Future of Security Studies” in Collins, Alan, ed. “Contemporary Security Studies”, pp. 393-410.
● Richard N. Rosecrance and Steven E. Miller’s chapter “6 The Thucydides Trap” in “The Next
Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict”.
● Benjamin Harris’ journal article “Coercive Diplomacy and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis”.
● Karen von Hippel book (1999) “Democracy by Force: US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold
War World”, chapter 1.
● David Lake’s journal article (2010) “Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory: Assessing Rationalist
Explanations of the Iraq War”.
Global Security Notes on *SOME* Readings
Table of Contents
“Security Studies: An Introduction” 2
An Introduction to Security Studies 2
PART 2: KEY CONCEPTS 4
Chapter 9: Uncertainty 4
Chapter 12: War 6
Chapter 13: Coercion 9
Chapter 18: Alliances 10
Chapter 27: Counterterrorism 12
Chapter 28: Counterinsurgency 14
“Contemporary Security Studies” 17
27 After the Return to Theory: The Past, Present and Future of Security Studies 17
“The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict” 19
6 The Thucydides Trap 19
“Coercive Diplomacy and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis” 20
“Democracy by Force: US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War World” 21
1. Introduction: Dangerous Hubris 21
“Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory: Assessing Rationalist Explanations of the Iraq War” 22
, 2
“Security Studies: An Introduction”
An Introduction to Security Studies
Security: Powerful (contested) political tool in claiming attention for priority items in the competition
for government attention.
WHAT IS SECURITY STUDIES?
Interplay of 5 forces central to understanding how the field has evolved:
1. Great-power politics = material power.
2. Technology = knowledge.
3. Key events = history.
4. Internal dynamics of academic debates = prevailing social construction.
5. Institutionalisation = wealth & organisational dynamics.
Security studies appeared during the Cold War.
➔ Dominant approach = advocating political realism, preoccupied with the 4 Ss:
1. States = most important agents & referents of security in international politics.
2. Strategy = core intellectual/practical concerns revolved around devising the best
means of employing the threat & use of military force.
3. Science = authentic, objective knowledge, adopting methods that follow the natural,
harder sciences to base specific policies.
4. Status quo = security policies helped prevent radical/revolutionary change to
international society while maintaining the position of own states within it.
➔ Barry Buzan’s (1983) People, States, and Fear alternative approach argued that the security
of human collectivities (NOT just states) was affected by factors in 5 major sectors:
1. Military security = interplay of states’ armed offensive & defensive capabilities +
states’ perceptions of each other’s intentions (military security → subset of security
studies as strategic studies).
2. Political security = organisational stability of states, systems of government &
ideologies that give them their legitimacy.
3. Economic security = access to the resources, finance & markets necessary to sustain
acceptable levels of welfare & state power.
4. Societal security = centred on the sustainability/evolution of traditional language,
culture, identities & customs.
5. Environmental security = maintenance of local & planetary biosphere as the
essential support system on which all other human enterprises depend.
Problems with thinking of security studies as a subfield of IR:
● Interstate relations are just 1 aspect of the security dynamics that characterise
contemporary world politics.
● For intellectual reasons → IR dominated by Anglo-American men linked to political realism.
● Security problems = complex/interdependent, IR CANNOT provide analysis/solutions.
DEFINING A FIELD OF INQUIRY
, 3
1. What is security?
Security → alleviation of threats to cherished values & pursuit of political & social ambitions
➔ Survival = existential condition.
➔ Survival-plus = additional freedom from life-determining threats + ability for life choices.
➔ 2 philosophies of security based on:
1. Accumulation of power: As a commodity (i.e., to be secure, actors must possess
money, weapons, territory etc.). More power = more security.
2. Emancipation: Concern with justice & human rights provision, as a relationship
between different actors. Involves gaining a degree of confidence + cooperating to
achieve security without depriving others of it.
● Can be:
○ Negative (i.e., absence of something threatening) → ‘freedom from’.
○ Positive (i.e. phenomena that make things possible) → ‘freedom to’.
● E.g., while the US thinks North Korea’s possession of nuclear weapons causes
insecurity, they do not feel the same way about those arsenals held by India.
● ‘Common Security’ (Olaf Palme): Protagonists must achieve security NOT
against the adversary BUT together with him.
● ‘International Security’ (Palme): Must rest on a commitment to joint survival
> threat of mutual destruction → promoting emancipatory politics.
2. Whose security are we talking about?
Approaches:
1. Historically, security has focused on people. ‘The national interests’ was exemplified
post-WWII → ‘state security’.
2. End of the Cold War focused on ‘human security’.
3. Concept of ‘society’ → to be fully human is to be part of specific social groups.
4. Via a level-of-analysis problem, ranging from:
● Lowest level (individual).
● Various sources of collective identities (bureaucracies, states, civilizations etc.).
● International system.
5. Security policies via an ecological sense (planet Earth) → humans are part of nature &
dependent on ecosystems/environment.
3. What counts as a security issue?
Every thinking individual operates with a unique set of security priorities/threat agendas shaped by
different factors (e.g., sex, gender, age, religious beliefs, etc.).
Perspectives on what should count as a security issue:
1. Security analysts should focus on matters related to armed conflict & the threat/use of
military force.
2. Security should be about alleviating the most serious threats preventing people from
pursuing their cherished values → lack of effective systems of health care (childbirth deaths,
paediatric respiratory & intestinal infections) = threat of armed conflict.
4. How can security be achieved?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller giacomoef. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R136,18. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.