100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary - Industrial Psychology 214 (IP214) R100,00   Add to cart

Summary

Summary - Industrial Psychology 214 (IP214)

1 review
 34 views  1 purchase

Made from class notes and class slides these notes explain theme 4-8 as prescribed

Preview 4 out of 116  pages

  • May 22, 2023
  • 116
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (1)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: rebecca811 • 5 months ago

avatar-seller
viankeherbst
lOMoARcPSD|22421257




Theme 1-8 - IP 214 year notes


Industrial Psychology
Industrial Psychology (Universiteit Stellenbosch)


214 chapter 4-8




Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Vianke Herbst (viankeherbst@gmail.com)

, lOMoARcPSD|22421257




Theme 4
UNIT 4


What is meant by the requirement that the measure of a measuring instrument should be reliable.

• Reliability= characteristic of a person's behaviour or the performance of an apparatus, which
indicates that one can rely on the person or apparatus [usually in a posive sense] in that the
person or object reacts the same way over me

• If the measures of a human characterisc/trait or of work performance do not remain similar
over several measures of the construct [which is assumed to be stable], it makes no sense to
base any decisions on them; one would not be able to rely on such measures because the
measures do not systemacally point to the [stable] construct to be measured.

• Measuremnt instrument= test, assesment, quesonare

• Construct= e.g. personality, character trait



Formal denions of reliability

• I the measurement doesn’t give us the same scores every me = doesn’t reect the
construct

• Reliability can be formally dened as follows: (you can use any of these denions to dene
reliability)

 1) the extent to which a scale tends to render the same measures with
repeated applicaons to the same individual/over repeated measurement
occasions/parallel measures = using the same test on the same person=
similar answers or use the test today and then in a week’s me= similar
outcomes each me or 2 tests prccally the same- the tests should give
similar outcomes

 2) the extent to which the variance in the test scores has been caused by
stable, systemacally working inuences= changes in the score reveals
dierences in the construct= one person has more or less of the construct
e.g extroversion

 3) the proporon of systemac test variance; in symbols thus  ²S/  ²X =
that varaibility in tests= scores are because of systematc inuences that we
expect to see

 4) the extent to which the test measurements are devoid of random error
variance [1 – ²e/  ²X.




Downloaded by Vianke Herbst (viankeherbst@gmail.com)

, lOMoARcPSD|22421257




Argue with the rst denion as a point of departure (1)

• we do not always get the same score but rather a distribuon of scores in spite of the fact
that that the latent variable remains constant over the measurement period. = no test ever
provides absolute reliability

• This phenomenon is to a certain extent true for any form of measurement.

• It thus follows that no measure is ever 100% / absolutely reliable according to the rst
denion of reliability.

Error distribuon of observed scores
Give you tests repeatedly= you won’t get the same
score every me – your score would be in a bell-
shaped curve – not vercal




Measurement error and error variance

• The queson as to why test measurements are never 100% /absolutely reliable thus changes
into an invesgaon into the causes of the random error score or random error variance=
there are inuences in you as a person and environment that inuence how you respond to
the test

• In order to answer the queson of why some measures are not reliable requires invesgaon
of:

 Why people dier in their test performance?

 What are the reasons which cause dierences in the scores between dierent tests
or people?

• The basic assumpon of psychological tesng is that any measure contains an element of
error and element of correctness.

• smulus is the test = measuring instrument; your response = we make inference about the
construct we are trying to measure= dierences will be due to your response




Downloaded by Vianke Herbst (viankeherbst@gmail.com)

, lOMoARcPSD|22421257




Reasons for individual dierences in test performance

 General long-term characteriscs of applicant = you as a person might not have a
certain construct= you not very extroverted

 Individual dierences in the characteriscs measured by the test= look at
personality= each individual is dierent and will have their own score or true score
on the construct for that test

 Temporary characteriscs of the applicants= not feeling well on test day

 Temporary or specic to the test or some part of it= something you don’t understand
in the test or anxiety in tests- specic to the test

 Condions of administraon of the test = you don’t like the person administering the
test to you/ venue too hot and noisy

 Pure chance= you don’t care so mark everything a

Dierences= seen as error

• Classical psychometric theory assumes that any measure X is the sum of the true measure
(true score) T and a measurement error (error score) E.




X=T+E

• X = observed score = you do a test as get a score- that score is referred to as X

• T=p

roporon true score (reliability of the measure)

• E = proporon error score (unexplained variance)

• The goal of reliability theory is to esmate errors in measurement and to suggest ways of
improving tests so that errors are minimized.

Measurement error

• Assuming that the construct we are measuring will not change over the short-term, the true
score [Ti] is a constant4= whatever your score is= part of that score is actually a true
reecon of the construct we want to measure

• Ei.= if we are looking for a reason for unreliability- it is found in the error

• Keeping in mind that psychological measurement is indirect measurement via a sample of
behaviour, the classical measurement theory acknowledges via Ei the fact that it is virtually




Downloaded by Vianke Herbst (viankeherbst@gmail.com)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller viankeherbst. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R100,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R100,00  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Buy now