100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Admin law Topic 3 notes R101,00   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Admin law Topic 3 notes

 12 views  1 purchase

Administrative Law notes for Topic 3 WITS 2023

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • June 2, 2023
  • 15
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (5)
avatar-seller
SilkeHinz
Administrative law – LAWS4063A

Topic 3: Lawfulness grounds of review



Prescribed Reading:

• Quinot (2020): Chapter 6 (145-170)
• Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others v Chief Executive Officer
of the South African Social Security Agency and Others (CCT 48/13) [2013] ZACC 42;
2014 (1) SA 604 (CC); 2014 (1) BCLR 1 (CC) (29 November 2013) (at paras 28-30 and
58) (99 paras)
• Chairman, State Tender Board v Digital Voice Processing (Pty) Ltd; Chairman, State
Tender Board v Sneller Digital (Pty) Ltd and Others 2012 (2) SA 16 (SCA)
• Dumani v Nair and Another 2013 (2) SA 274 (SCA)
• Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd and Others v Greater Johannesburg Transitional
Metropolitan Council and Others 1999 (1) SA 374 (CC)
• Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs (CCT35/99) [2000] ZACC 8; 2000 (3) SA 936; 2000
(8) BCLR 837 (7 June 2000), esp paras 40-56 (70 paras)
• Gauteng Gambling Board and Another v MEC for Economic Development, Gauteng
2013 (5) SA 24 (SCA)
• Judicial Service Commission and Another v Cape Bar Council and Another 2013 (1) SA
170 (SCA)
• Long Beach Homeowners Association v Department of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries (South Africa) and Another (865/2016) [2017] ZASCA 122; 2018 (2) SA 42
(SCA) (22 September 2017)
• Walele v City of Cape Town (CCT 64/07) [2008] ZACC 11; 2008 (6) SA 129 (CC); 2008
(11) BCLR 1067 (CC) (13 June 2008) esp paras 54-63 (Jafta AJ) and 112-117 (O’Regan J)
(144 paras)
• Marshall NO and Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
(CCT208/17) [2018] ZACC 11; 2018 (7) BCLR 830 (CC)
• MEC for Health, Eastern Cape and Another v Kirland Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Eye and
Lazer Institute 2014 (3) SA 481 (CC)
• Minister of Trade and Industry and Others v Nieuwoudt and Another 1985 (2) SA 1 (C)
at 13
• Millennium Waste Management (Pty) Ltd v Chairperson, Tender Board: Limpopo
Province (31/2007) [2007] ZASCA 165; [2007] SCA 165 (RSA); [2008] 2 All SA 145; 2008
(2) SA 481; 2008 (5) BCLR 508; 2008 (2) SA 481 (SCA) (29 November 2007) (35 paras)
(read for technical compliance point)
• Pepcor Retirement Fund v Financial Services Board 2003 (6) SA 38 (SCA) ( 198/2002)
[2003] ZASCA 56; [2003] 3 All SA 21 (SCA) (30 May 2003) (54 paras)

Page 1 of 15

, • Security Industry Alliance v Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority and Others
2015 (1) SA 169 (SCA)
• University of Cape Town v Ministers of Education and Culture 1988 (3) SA 203 (C), esp
212F-212J
• Van Eck, NO, and Van Rensburg, NO, v Etna Stores 1947 (2) SA 984 (A)


Learning Outcomes:

• Explain the lawfulness requirement for administrative action as required by the
Constitution.
• Identify the key provisions in PAJA that deal with lawfulness.
• Explain the relevance of authority or authorisation for lawfulness of administrative
action.
• Explain what delegation of authority entails and its impact on the lawfulness of
administrative action.
• Explain the meaning of discretionary powers and how the exercise of such powers can
determine the lawfulness of administrative action.
• Apply the various grounds of lawfulness review to a given set of facts.
• Explain the important principles regarding compliance with mandatory and prescribed
conditions and procedures in taking administrative action.


6.1 Introduction

➢ Lawfulness: admin action + authorisation = aligned
➢ Lawfulness is a constraint on all exercises of public power → meaning that it applies
to both ‘administrative decisions’ (subject to PAJA) as well as ‘non-administrative
decisions’ (subject to the principle of legality)
➢ Fedsure: fundamental principle of the rule of law that exercise of PP is only legitimate
where lawful




Page 2 of 15

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SilkeHinz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R101,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R101,00  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now