100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL3701 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 - GUARANTEED DISTINCTION Good grades R63,42
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 - GUARANTEED DISTINCTION Good grades

 261 views  3 purchases

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 - GUARANTEED DISTINCTION Good grades +068 for any assistance. Case name Ratio dicendi of the case Area of insolvency law applicable a)Estate Wege v Strauss 2932 AD 76 A trust cannot be a debtor and therefore cannot be sequestrated. Sectio...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • July 26, 2023
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (93)
avatar-seller
Tutor23
MRL3701 Assignment 1
(ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 -
GUARANTEED DISTINCTION
Good grades

Whatsapp +254740539068 for any assistance.




Case name Ratio dicendi of the case Area of insolvency law
applicable

a)Estate Wege v Strauss 2932 A trust cannot be a debtor Section 29 of the Insolvency
and therefore cannot be Act 24 of 1936.
AD 76
sequestrated.

, Case name Ratio dicendi of the case Area of insolvency law
applicable
a)Estate Wege v Strauss 2932 A trust cannot be a debtor Section 29 of the Insolvency
AD 76 and therefore cannot be Act 24 of 1936.
sequestrated.


b) Epstein v Epstein 1987 (4) Although a betting Friendly Sequestrations
transaction is an invalid
SA 606
agreement and unenforceable
in court, payment of such a
wavering debt is not a
disposition without value.

c) Pretorius’ Trustee v Van This case discusses the It does not address whether a
Blommenstein 1949 (1) SA requirement that three- trust can be a debtor and
fourths in value and in sequestrated.
267 (O)
number of the creditors who
proved their claims must
accept the offer of
composition to render it valid
and enforceable.

d) Magnum Financial Holdings The court must determine Section 26 of the Insolvency
(PTY) Ltd (In Litigation) v whether the defense of Act 24 of 1936.
Summerly and Another NNO "ordinary course of business"
1984 (1) SA 160 (W) and "intention to prefer" is
applicable in each case.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Tutor23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R63,42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52355 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R63,42  3x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added