100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023 R50,00   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023

 1 view  0 purchase

LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • August 15, 2023
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (35)
avatar-seller
mulah11
LEV3701
Assignment 1
Semester 2 2023
[Document subtitle]




[DATE]
[COMPANY NAME]
[Company address]

, LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023

a. Mr C testifies in court about the theft of his car. During cross-examination
the defence alleges that Mr C is lying. The prosecutor accordingly calls Mr W
to come and testify that Mr C had earlier told him the same thing. Mr W’s
evidence is....
1. opinion evidence.
2. hearsay evidence.
3. circumstantial evidence.
4. evidence about a previous consistent statement.
In a court case where Mr. C is testifying about the theft of his car, the defense
accuses him of lying during cross-examination. To support Mr. C's credibility,
the prosecutor calls Mr. W as a witness. Mr. W testifies that Mr. C had
previously told him the same story about the car theft. This type of evidence is
categorized as "evidence about a previous consistent statement." It's used to
show that Mr. C's current testimony is consistent with what he had previously
stated, making his version of events more reliable.
b. Consider the following statements regarding marital privilege and choose
the correct option:
1. A third party that overhears a conversation between two spouses cannot
testify about that communication in a court of law.
This statement is partially true. Generally, a third party who overhears a
conversation between spouses might be prohibited from testifying about that
communication due to spousal privilege, which is intended to protect the
privacy of marital communications. However, there can be exceptions, and the
admissibility of such evidence might vary depending on the jurisdiction and
the circumstances.


This statement is false. Marital privilege can still apply to communications
made during the marriage, even after divorce. The termination of the
marriage does not necessarily remove the protection afforded by marital
privilege to certain confidential communications made between spouses.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mulah11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80467 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00
  • (0)
  Buy now