A +
QUESTION 1
Study the case Foskor Limited v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR
1003/2011) [2022] ZALCJHB 28 (17 February 2022) and write a two-page legal opinion about the case. Your
legal opinion must have the following -
• summary of the facts (2)
• issue(s) in dispute in the case (1)
• the court’ decision (1)
• At the end provide a well-supported legal opinion which should cover the importance of the case
(importance of the case (this is important as it carries
more marks). (6) - TOTAL: [10]
QUESTIONS/ ANSWERS CONTINUE….
DISTINCTION Footnotes and/or Bibliography
GUARANTEED!!! included. *
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
This document is to be used for comparison, research, and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold, or transmitted in any form or by
any means without prior written permission from the Author. By making use of this document, you agree to fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse
this document. – STUDY BUDDY TUTOR SA
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email: studybuddytutorsa@gmail.com
, Study the case Foskor Limited v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and
Arbitration and Others (JR 1003/2011) [2022] ZALCJHB 28 (17 February 2022)
and write a two-page legal opinion about the case. Your legal opinion must have
the following -
• summary of the facts (2)
• issue(s) in dispute in the case (1)
• the court’ decision (1)
• At the end provide a well-supported legal opinion which should cover the
importance of the case (importance of the case (this is important as it carries
more marks). (6)
TOTAL: [10]
Legal Opinion on Foskor Limited v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and
Arbitration and Others (JR 1003/2011) [2022] ZALCJHB 28 (17 February 2022)
Summary of the Facts:
The case of Foskor Limited v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
and Others involves a dispute between Foskor Limited, an employer, and the
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and its employees.
Foskor Limited is a mining company that operates in South Africa. The employees,
who are members of a trade union, lodged a dispute with the CCMA regarding the
interpretation and application of certain provisions of their employment contracts. The
dispute was referred to arbitration, and the CCMA issued an arbitration award in favour
of the employees. Foskor Limited then sought to review and set aside the arbitration
award.
Issue(s) in Dispute:
The main issue in dispute in this case is the interpretation and application of the
provisions of the employment contracts between Foskor Limited and its employees.
