Exam (elaborations)
LPL4802 Assignment 1 [Detailed Answers] Semester 1 - Due: 28 March 2024
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
LPL4802 Assignment 1 [Detailed Answers] Semester 1 - Due: 28 March 2024
[Show more]
7 reviews
By: LorealSegone • 8 months ago
By: mzimavi • 8 months ago
By: cibanguhlami • 8 months ago
By: thandekamathaa • 1 year ago
By: hanrosmit1015 • 1 year ago
By: preneshvicklus • 8 months ago
By: loratomathe29 • 1 year ago
By: StudentGyde • 1 year ago
Truly appreciate the feedback. We are delighted to hear that you found the content helpful and worthy of a five-star rating. Your satisfaction is our priority, and we look forward to serving you with more valuable materials in the future. Should you require any further assistance, please don't hesitate to reach out.
Content preview
LPL4802ASSIGNMENT 1 (SEMESTER 1)
DUE DATE: 28 March 2024
Written Assignment Submission Guidelines:
Please ensure that your assignment is submitted electronically through the myUnisa platform no
later than 28 March 2024. Kindly note that fax or email submissions will not be accepted.
NB: Assignment submitted to the lecturer(s) through email will not be considered.
QUESTION 1:
1(a) In Transnet Ltd v Sechaba Photoscan (Pty) Ltd (2005) (1) SA 299 SCA, the Court expressed the view that:
“it is now beyond question that damages in delict (and contract) are assessed according to the comparative
method “ @ [15]
Write an essay where you discuss the validity and or relevance of this statement with regard to the assessment
of damage/s in the South African law of damages jurisprudence. In your discussion, consider the sum formula
approach and the concrete concept of damage. NB. Do not include positive and negative interesse in your
discussion.
***ESSAY***
TITLE: The Validity and Relevance of the Comparative Method in Assessing Damages in South African Law
INTRODUCTION:
In Transnet Ltd v Sechaba Photoscan (Pty) Ltd (2005) (1) SA 299 SCA, the South African Court stated
that damages in delict (and contract) are assessed according to the comparative method. This
statement signifies a significant aspect of South African law concerning the assessment of damages.
In this essay, we will delve into the validity and relevance of this statement within the context of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudentGyde. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now