100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Constitutional Law 271 Part 2C (2023) R65,00   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Constitutional Law 271 Part 2C (2023)

 4 views  0 purchase

In this document you will find a comprehensive set of notes including class notes, slides, case discussions and textbook readings. It emphasises the important topics for test purposes.

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • October 23, 2023
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (18)
avatar-seller
siobhandebruyn
2. Bill of Rights Litigation:



(C): Remedy Stage
 S172 Constitution

Introduction:
- Get to this stage when court finds that limitation = unjustifiable
- Declarations of invalidity confirmed by CC
o Confirms order & may vary remedy granted by lower court

Remedies:
- Direct application of BOR
o Most in a vertical relationship
- S172(1)(a):
o When deciding a constitutional matter, a court
 (a) must declare that any law or conduct that is inconsistent with
the constitution as invalid to the extent of its inconsistency
o Remedy: Declaration of invalidity
o No discretion when found that violation cannot be justified
- Declaration of invalidity not always enough
- Need to remedy harm that may have occurred / remedy defect causing harm
- S172(b):
o Court may make an order that is just and equitable including
 (i) An order limiting the retrospective effect of the declaration of
invalidity
 (ii) An order suspending the declaration of invalidity for any
period and on any conditions
- S38:
o Anyone listed in this section has the right to approach a competent
court, alleging that a right in the BOR has been infringed or threatened,
and the court may grant appropriate relief, including a declaration of
rights

In SA: Flexible approach to granting remedies
- Fose v MSS:
o Left to court to decide what would be appropriate relief
  relief that is required to protect and enforce the CT; if
necessary, court may have to fashion new remedies to secure
protection and enforcement of these NB rights
 = BROAD discretionary power to decide “appropriate relief”
- What limits court’s ability to fashion new remedies?
o SOP Concerns

, o = not court’s responsibility to make and execute laws

Private violation of fundamental rights – S8(2):
- Direct horizontal application of BOR
o S8(3): a court
 (a) In order to give effect to right must apply, or if necessary,
develop the CL to extent that legislation does not give effect to
that right
o Remedy: not in legislation; development of CL
- When done so – have regard to S39(2)
o Spirit, purport & objects of BOR
- Also – court keep in mind that not engine of law = incremental development

Indirect application:
- Relief in terms of interpretation of legislation / development of common law or
customary law
- Remedy: reading down
o Mandatory rule of statutory interpretation  attempt to avoid
declaration of invalidity
 Use BOR to bring law in line with the CT = indirect application
o May be done if legislative provision is reasonably capable of being
interpreted in conformity with CT

Purpose of constitutional remedies:
- Vindicate constitutional rights & constitution and deter future infringements by
legislature or private parties
- Ideal construct of a constitutional world = adherence to fundamental
democratic values based on human dignity; equality & freedom
o Synchronise with real world where violations occur (Fose v MSS)

Factors relevant in considering appropriate remedy:
- Constitutional remedies must generally be
o Forward-looking (to achieve aim of democratic society)
o Community orientated
 When rights are violated – harm usually suffered by a whole
community
 Remedy crafted to protect entire community > individualistic
approach to remedy
o Structural
 Tries to correct constitutional structure (as envisaged in CT)
- Remedies must be effective:
o Hoffman v SAA:
 SAA policy – don’t employ HIV+

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller siobhandebruyn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R65,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R65,00
  • (0)
  Buy now