Exam (elaborations)
CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2023
- Course
- (CRW2602)
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2023
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
lOMoARcPSD|8719536CRW2602 Questions and Answers
Criminal Law: Specific Crimes (University of South Africa)
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Morongwa Dolly ()
, lOMoARcPSD|8719536
CLS cc ©
Criminal Law 2 Questions
1
CRIMINAL LAW 201 QUESTION PACK:
TOPIC – PERPETRATOR/ACCOMPLICE:
For a person to be guilty as an accomplice, there are certain
requirements which must be complied with. Name and discuss these
requirements. (7)
A person is an accomplice if
1) Although he does not comply with all the requirements for liability
set out in the definition of the crime, and
2) Although the conduct required for a conviction is not imputed to
him in terms of the doctrine of common purpose,
He engages in conduct whereby he furthers the commission of the crime
by somebody else.
Requirements for liability as an accomplice
1) Act
2) Unlawfulness
3) Intention
4) Accessory character of liability
Explain the difference between a perpetrator, an accomplice and an
accessory after the fact. In your answer you must also give an example of
each. (8)
A person is a perpetrator if:
(1) his conduct, the circumstances in which it takes place (including,
where relevant, a particular description with which he as a person
must, according to the definition of the offence, comply), and the
culpability with which it is carried out are such that he satisfies all the
requirements for liability contained in the definition of the offence
OR
(2) if, although his own conduct does not comply with that required in
the definition of the crime, he acted together with one or more persons
and the conduct required for a conviction is imputed to him by virtue
of the principles relating to the doctrine of common purpose.
A person is an accomplice if:
(1) although he does not comply with all the requirements for liability
set out in the definition of the crime, and
(2) although the conduct required for a conviction is not imputed to
him in terms of the doctrine of common purpose, he engages in
conduct whereby he furthers the commission of the crime by somebody
else.
Critical Law Studies cc ©
Downloaded by Morongwa Dolly ()
, lOMoARcPSD|8719536
CLS cc ©
Criminal Law 2 Questions
2
A person is an accessory after the fact to the commission of a crime if,
after the commission of the crime, she unlawfully and intentionally
engages in conduct intended to enable the perpetrator of or accomplice
to the crime to evade liability for her crime, or to facilitate such a
person's evasion of liability.
A shoots Y. Y falls to the ground mortally wounded. B (who has not
previously agreed with A to kill Y) appears on the scene and stabs Y with
a knife. The stab wound does not hasten Y’s death. Y dies as a result of
the bullet wound. A needs help to dispose of the body. For this purpose,
A calls in the help of C, who has agreed before the killing to assist A in
the disposing of the body, and D, a friend of C’s who had no such prior
agreement with A. Briefly discuss the criminal liability of B, C and D.
(6)
You have to discuss the criminal liability of B, C and D in this set of facts.
Allocate 2 marks for B, C and D respectively and do not waste any time in
discussing the liability of A.
B is guilty of attempted murder and can be referred to as a “joiner-in”
since he associated himself with others’ common purpose at a stage when
Y’s lethal wound had already been inflicted, although Y was then still
alive.
C may be a perpetrator or an accomplice , if his conduct, culpability and
personal qualities accord with the definition of murder, he will be a co-
perpetrator. He may also be an accomplice because he furthered the
commission of the crime.
D is an accessory after the fact. A person is an accessory after the fact to
the commission of a crime if, after the commission of the crime, he
unlawfully and intentionally engages in conduct intended to enable the
perpetrator of or accomplice to the crime to evade liability for the crime,
or to facilitate such a person’s evasion of liability. Helping a perpetrator to
dispose of the body of a person he has killed is an example of conduct that
makes a person an accessory after the fact.
Discuss the liability of the participant who is commonly referred to
as a “joiner-in”. (6)
The “joiner-in” is a person
• Whose attack on Y did not hasten Y’s death
• Whose blow was administered at a time when Y was still alive
• Who did not act with a common purpose together with the other
persons who also inflicted wounds on Y.
Thus, here, the person comes onto the scene AFTER the mortal wound
has been inflicted on Y, but while Y is still alive and the wound inflicted
on Y does NOT hasten his death PLUS this “joiner-in” has NO prior
agreement with the persons who inflicted the mortal wound on Y.
Critical Law Studies cc ©
Downloaded by Morongwa Dolly ()
, lOMoARcPSD|8719536
CLS cc ©
Criminal Law 2 Questions
3
X1, X2 and X3 are members of a criminal gang. Their main activity is to
break into residential homes with the purpose of stealing valuable items.
They usually watch the houses they intend to break into in order to
establish at which time the owner is not home. One evening X1, X2 and
X3 take three guns and travel by car to the house of Z. Because they
have been watching Z’s house over a period of time, they know that he
goes out between seven and eight o’clock every evening. They climb over
the electronic gate of Z’s property at exactly fifteen minutes past seven.
X1 inserts a screwdriver in the lock of the backdoor of Z’s house and
breaks it open. He and his mates (X2 and X3) enter the house. Suddenly
the alarm goes off. They start running away but as they approach the
gate, Z (the owner of the house) enters with his car through the gate. X2
starts to panic and fires a shot at Z. Z is killed instantly. X1, X2 and X3
are all charged with murder.
You are the state prosecutor. Discuss the relevant legal principles and case law
which you will rely upon in order to prove that X1, X2 and X3 are all guilty of
the crime of murder. (12)
You are required to discuss the legal principles which a state prosecutor
will rely upon to prove that all the participants (X1, X2 and X3) are guilty
of murder. The legal principles applied in terms of the doctrine of common
purpose are relevant to this particular set of facts.
The definition of this doctrine of common purpose is the following: if two
or more people, having a common purpose to commit a crime, act
together in order to achieve the purpose, the acts of each of them in
execution of such a purpose are imputed to the others. Therefore when the
doctrine is applied, a causal link between each participant’s act and the
prohibited result is NOT required. The existence of a common purpose
may be proved on the basis of prior agreement, or active association and
participation in a common criminal design. The state must, however,
prove that each participant had the necessary intention to commit the
crime of murder. The relevant case law is Safatsa; Mgedezi and Thebus.
According to the facts, there was prior agreement among the three
participants to commit housebreaking. Moreover, each participant
performed an act of association with the execution of the housebreaking.
X2 fired the shot at Z which caused his death. The state nevertheless has
to prove that X2 had the intention to kill Z before he can be convicted of
the crime of murder.
As far as X1 and X3 are concerned, the state has to prove that they had
foreseen the possibility that the acts of any of the participants might
result in a person’s death, and that they had reconciled themselves to
such a possibility.
An important fact in support of proof of the existence of dolus eventualis
on the part of X1 and X3 is that they also had guns with them when they
Critical Law Studies cc ©
Downloaded by Morongwa Dolly ()
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dollymorongwa6. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R133,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now