Summary
Summary-LLB 2LP1302
- Course
- (2LPI302)
- Institution
- University Of Zululand (UNIZULU)
This document or notes focus on the specific forms of Inuiria we have in South African law
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
SPECIFIC FORMS OF INIURIA (Personality Infringement) – Chapter 30Physical Integrity
Good Name
Consequence
Study Unit 30 - The right to physical integrity; the right to a good name or fama; rights relating to dignitas
30. The right to physical integrity; the right to a good name or fama; rights relating to dignitas
Defamation
• The intentional infringement of another person’s right to his good name
• Defamation is the wrongful, intentional publication of words or behaviour concerning another person which has
the effect on injuring his status, good name or reputation
• Elements of this iniuria; the act, an injury to personality, wrongfulness and intent
• True defamatory words can also be actionable
Elements:
1.Publication (act)
• Defamation will arise only if disclosed to 3rd person (because relates to opinion of others concerning person), dws
publication is necessary
• Dws only needed to disclose is to at least 1 other person (other than plaintiff himself)
Qualifications:
• Not considered publication if disclosure made to outsider unaware of the meaning/defamatory character thereof
irt plaintiff
• Communication of such defamation concerning 3rd party from one spouse to another, does not constitute
publication
• Once publication established, plaintiff must prove that defendant was responsible for the publication.
• Question is whether result was foreseen/reasonably foreseeable
• Not only origin of defamation, but also persons repeating it, are responsible for its publication
2.Defamatory effect: wrongfulness/unlawfulness (infringement of personality right/defamatory effect)
• Wrongfulness lies in infringement of person’s right to his good name
• Question of whether good name has in fact (factually) been infringed is irrelevant
• Question should rather be (objectively) if the reasonable man is of the opinion that the reputation has been injured
– embodiment of boni mores criterion
Principles applicable here ito reasonable person test:
• Reasonable/normal/fictional/well-balanced/right-thinking person, with normal emotional reactions, not
oversensitive or hyper-critical
• Someone who subscribes to norms/values of Constitution
• Member of society in general, and not of a specific group
• Reaction of reasonable person dependent on circumstances
• Verbal abuse is not defamation (doesn’t injure good name)
• Words/behaviour are prima facie defamatory or not – but may even in secondary meaning be defamatory
(innuendo) – primary and secondary meaning ascertained objectively bmo test
• Ambiguous meaning – follow one most favourable to defendant
Grounds of justification (5)
• Plantiff proves defemation = prima facie proof of wrongfulness
• Defendant has onus to rebut + prove justification
Law of Delict – PVL 3703 – Second Semester – 2011 Page 51
, 1.Privilege or privileged occasion: Privilege
• Someone has right/duty to make certain defamatory assertions (to injure another’s good name)
• Absolute privilege (regulated by statute): Liability completely excluded
• Eg members of parliament having complete freedom of speech during debates
• Relative privilege: Only conditional protection – It falls away as soon as plaintiff proves defendant exceeded the
bounds
Duty discharge or interest furtherance
• Legal duty
• Social/moral duty – reasonable person test
• Legitimate interest
• Other person has corresponding duty to learn of the assertion
• Defendant must prove he acted within the scope/limits
• Plaintiff may still show he has malice
Judicial/quasi-judicial proceedings
• Applies to all participants
• They enjoy provisional protection
• Two grounds: relevance and reasonable grounds – absence of one = limits exceeded
• But plaintiff may still prove excess ito malice
Privileged reports
• Court/parliament/public body proceedings’ publications
• Must be fair and substantially accurate account of proceedings
2.Truth and public interest
• Prima facie wrongfulness will be cancelled if defendant proves the remarks were true & in public interest – only has
to prove substantial, not literal, truth
• Public interest depends on boni mores
• Time/manner/occasion is NB – don’t rake up past transgressions
• Here, limits are NOT exceeded if person acted with malice
3.Media privilege
• Publication of false/untrue defamatory statements
• Apply this defence with caution
• Reasonableness depends on boni mores
Factors:
• Public interest (not interestedness)
• Nature of info on which it is based
• Nature of mass-medium used
• Extent of distribution
• Reliability of info
• Steps taken to verify info
• Opportunity given to person to react
• Necessity/urgency to publish before verification
• Was less harmful means to achieve same objective available
• Malicious motive
4.Political privilege
• Publication of false/untrue defamatory allegations
• Publications on political terrain
Law of Delict – PVL 3703 – Second Semester – 2011 Page 52
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller conny23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R133,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now