100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary CRIMINAL LAW: elements, principles, practice questions R200,00
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. (PBL3801W)

Summary

Summary CRIMINAL LAW: elements, principles, practice questions

2 reviews
 7 purchases

-I received 80% for crim studying only from these notes (pm me if you want a screenshot) - all principles that state the relevant element too - translated elements for every crime - well structured practice answers that are colour-coded - mini summaries of cases

Last document update: 1 year ago

Preview 4 out of 63  pages

Document information

  • November 9, 2023
  • November 9, 2023
  • 63
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: chidoalice1092 • 3 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: tmminele • 4 months ago

Seller

avatar-seller
LawGuru

Reviews received

Content preview

Kaya Borkowski



Criminal Law



Content
- Translated elements
- Principles for each crime
- Practice questions answers and mini case summaries



Translated elements and principles

Crimes
1. Incomplete offences
2. Arson
3. Assault
4. Theft
5. Robbery
6. Fraud
7. Drug possession




Incomplete Offences
- Attempt
- Conspiracy
- Incitement




Attempt

- Conduct: the conduct must be consummated (Nhlovo)
- Unlawfulness: there must be a connection to the crime. Section 18(1) Riotous
Assemblies Act
- Causation: formally defined. Causation only applies to consequence crimes.
Attempt is not a consequence crime (Ngobese)
- Capacity: presumed unless proven otherwise as per Section 78(1A) of the
Criminal Procedure Act


Distribution of this document is illegal

,Kaya Borkowski



- Fault: not specified by Riotous Assemblies Act but there exists a presumption
that fault is an essential element of crime (De Blom). There must be an intention
to commit the crime (not intention to attempt to commit) (Schoombie) or attempt
requires intention (Nhlovo)

Note: for conduct, the test is whether the commencement of consummation
occurred, not just mere preparation (Schoombie)

Principles for Attempt
- Regardless of whether the attempt is complete, it will be punishable if it were a
complete attempt at the point where there the commencement of consummation
has begun(Schoombie on conduct)

- Mere preparation is not punishable (Schoombie on conduct)
- Voluntary withdrawal is still punishable because the accused’s acts had already
reached the stage of consummation (Hlatwayo on conduct)

Relevant cases for attempt
- S v Masilela (strangled and assaulted victim, set house alight and left)
- Nhlovo (asked someone to put poison in someone else’s food)
- Schoombie (attempted arson. Poured petrol around shop to set it alight but was
interrupted)


Conspiracy

- Conduct: an agreement to commit a crime (Ngobese)
- Unlawfulness: agreement to commit a crime (Ngobese) (s 18(2)(a) of the
Riotous Assemblies Act)
- Causation: formally defined so not required (Ngobese; Snyman)
- Capacity: presumed as per s78(1A) CPA
- Fault: intention (Ngobese)

Principles for Conspiracy

- the liability of the accused is established upon overt manifestation of assent to
the conspiracy by the other person (Ngobese on conduct)
- Conspiracy can be tacit (Ngobese on conduct)
- If there is no meeting of the minds, conduct cannot be established (Harris* on
conduct)



Distribution of this document is illegal

,Kaya Borkowski




*Harris is not a prescribed case and is older than Ngobese but both are HC
judgements so could be useful

Relevant cases for conspiracy
- Ngobese (conspired to kill someone, other person said minds did not meet)

Incitement

- Conduct: conduct: seeking to influence the mind of another towards the
commission of a crime (Nkosiyana)
- Unlawfulness: section 18(2)(b) Riotous Assemblies Act
- Capacity: presumed as per section 78(1A) CPA
- Causation: formally defined so does not need to be proven (Snyman)
- Fault: intention (Nkosiyana)

Principles for Incitement

- The inciter does not need to persuade the incitee to be held liable (Nkosiyana on
conduct)
- The accused does not need to know the identity of the person or persons incited.
In fact, incitement can be directed even at a crowd of unknown people (Segale
on conduct)

Relevant cases for incitement
- Nkosiyana (arranged to assassinate a political leader. Accused claimed he did
not incite the under cover cop)




Arson

- Conduct: setting fire (Dalindyebo)
- Unlawfulness: infringement of property rights in relation to immoveable property
and also serves to protect community interests in protecting against the danger
of fire-setting to others (Snyman; Dalindyebo)
- Causation: materially defined (Snyman)
- Capacity: presumed as per s78(1A) CPA
- Fault: intention (Van Zyl)



Distribution of this document is illegal

, Kaya Borkowski




Principles for arson

- it is unlawful to set fire to one's own property where there is an intention to harm
another (Dalindyebo on unlawfulness)

- X commits arson if he sets fire to his own insured property in order to claim its
value from the insurer (Van Zyl on unlawfulness)

- X commits arson if he sets fire to his own property if it could injure another (Van
Zyl on unlawfulness)

- Intention, and more particularly an intention to damage property by setting fire to
it, thereby causing patrimonial harm to somebody, is required (Mavros on
intention)

Relevant cases for arson
- Dalindeybo
- Van Zyl




Assault

- Conduct: application of force to another (Jolly) or a threat to inspire fear (Miya)
- Unlawfulness: infringement of bodily integrity (Marx)
- Causation: materially defined. There must be a causal link between threat and
infringement of bodily integrity (Snyman)
- Capacity: presumed as per section 78(1A) CPA
- Fault: intention (Jolly)

Principles for Assault
- Force can be applied directly or indirectly (Jolly on conduct)

- There must firstly be a threat imminent or immediate harm; it must secondly be
reasonable for the victim to believe this threat and lastly that the accused is
capable of carrying out this threat (Miya at 289 on unlawfulness)

- If, for some reason, X believed that her threats would not be taken seriously by Y,
she lacked the required intention (Mtimunye on intention)



Distribution of this document is illegal

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LawGuru. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R200,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Start selling
R200,00  7x  sold
  • (2)
Add to cart
Added