Table of Contents
Participation notes.............................................................................................................1
Notes from class:..........................................................................................................................1
What are the problems pertaining to the prosecution of Group offenders?.................................2
What are the differences between the various forms of Group Participation in the perpetration
of offences?..................................................................................................................................3
Do the varying forms of Group participation attract different forms of criminal liability and/or
punishment?................................................................................................................................5
What is a Deemed Participant in the commission of a crime?......................................................5
What are the requirements of the doctrine of Common purpose?...............................................6
Under what circumstances can a deemed perpetrator dissociate from participating in the
commission of a crime?................................................................................................................7
Notes from class:
- Non-participants conduct or causation was more remote than participants
, - Accomplice: is a person/accused whose conduct assists the main perpetrator.
Doesn’t commit the crime in their own right. (Williams)
- Perpetrator: ordinary= individual accused person
- Perpetrator: deemed by common purpose= ex lege through operation of law. Didn’t
do it like an ordinary perpetrator but the law says you gave to prevent group actions.
By mandate= pay someone to do something By active association= list of
requirements
What are the problems pertaining to the prosecution of Group
offenders?
Moseneke J: ‘The phenomenon of serious crimes committed by collective individuals, acting
in concert, remains a significant societal scourge. In consequence crimes such as murder,
robbery, malicious damage to property and arson, it is often difficult to prove that the act of
each person or of a particular person in the group contributed causally to the criminal
result. Such a causal prerequisite for liability would render nugatory and ineffectual the
object of the criminal norm of common purpose and make prosecution of collaborative
criminal enterprises intractable and ineffectual.’ (Thebus-34)
Joubert JA: ‘[a]n accomplice is not a perpetrator or co-perpetrator, since he lacks the actus
reus of the perpetrator.’ (Williams-63)
Evidential problems addressed through criminal law doctrine (rules).
(a) Proof of Conduct
- Example – Thebus: Thebus denied being present at the scene and that he was visiting
his second wife in Fish Hoek (Alibi defence) (Thebus-11)
- Example – Mgedezi: Mgedezi denied being at the compound during the evening of
18 February 1986. He said he spent the night with Colbert Mtjelwa (Mgedezi-710G)
- Example – Sefatsa: Sefatsa denied being on Nhlapo street (Sharpville) during the
evening of 3 September 1984 (Sefatsa-872)
(b) Proof of Causation
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lawstudent26359. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R82,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.