100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary KRM 320(A) Why Modern Criminologists Ignore Female Crime: Study unit 9 R50,00
Add to cart

Summary

Summary KRM 320(A) Why Modern Criminologists Ignore Female Crime: Study unit 9

1 review
 137 views  1 purchase

A complete summary of essay 21 (unit 9) - why modern criminologists ignore female crime.

Last document update: 6 year ago

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • January 18, 2018
  • December 15, 2018
  • 2
  • 2016/2017
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (26)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: thelmamunashechinyamurindi • 6 year ago

avatar-seller
LieselRob
KRM 320(A) UNIT 9: MODERN CRIMINOLOGISTS

Essay 21: Why modern criminologists ignore female crime

 Modern theories in Criminology almost ignored female crime entirely
 Vast majority of theories were developed with male criminality in mind & teste for accuracy on male
samples
 If women were mentioned = they ended up as a footnote/ afterthought mostly to explain why theories
could not be used to explain female criminality
 Modern theories refer to the sub-cultural, social structure, social control, social process and labelling
perspectives in criminology – examples of each discussed below

 SUBCULTURE PERSPECTIVE: Subculture of violence theory (Wolfgang & Ferracuti 1967)
 Explains high levels of violence among lower-class poor, urban males = quick resort to physical
aggression is socially approved and expected accompanying certain stimuli
 SOCIAL STRUCTURE PERSPECTIVE: Opportunity theory (Cloward & Ohlin 1961)
 Model explaining gang delinquency = role of illegitimate opportunity structures in development of
deviant adaptations to anomic conditions; if you have illegitimate opportunity structures available,
person is likely to use as adaptation to anomic conditions
 SOCIAL CONTROL PERSPECTIVE: Delinquency & Drift theory (Matza & Sykes 1957)
 Examines process by which legal norms are neutralised by juveniles (juveniles exercise of choices &
their sense of injustice they received)
 SOCIAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE: Differential Reinforcement theory (Burgess & Akers 1966)
 They re-evaluated Sutherland's theory about DA using behaviourism and incorporated psychological
principles of operant conditioning maintaining that even non-social effects can reinforce criminal
behaviour
 LABELLING PERSPECTIVE: Dramatisation of evil (Tannenbaum 1938)
 Process of defining deviant behaviour as different among juvenile delinquents & conventional society,
causing a "tagging" of juveniles as delinquent by mainstream society. Stigma accompanying deviant
"tag" causes a person fall into deeper nonconformity

 Explanations for remarkable lack of interest are limited & mostly focused on following reasons:
 As result of the fact that official female crime rate is so low, female crime is considered non-
problematic
 Feminists argue it is another example of invisibility of women in society
 Women have significantly lower violent crime rate than men = low robbery, burglary, theft and
organised crime rate (usually steal smaller items/ less value items); when involved in
embezzlement & fraud they yield less financial gain than men; most do not have previous criminal
records – reasons why it is seen as unimportant
 Also stated that chivalry hypothesis exists = less offenders that are prosecuted so statistics are
lower/ less
 In SA females make up 3% of prison population, in England 11% of convictions
 Because traditional criminologists didn’t regard female criminality as important research focus area &
thus unworthy of theoretical development, modern criminologists had nothing to build & elaborate on
 Should be kept in mind that Lombroso and Ferrero, W.I. Thomas and Otto Pollak were exceptions to
the rule in the bigger field of what’s considered as traditional Criminology
 However all these theorists explained female criminality from a man’s perspective or using male
examples to derive reasons for female criminality
 Lombroso & Ferrero (La Donna Delinquente) with offensive, sexist and misogynistic insights of
female offenders – females were subordinate to males in that time

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LieselRob. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00  1x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added