100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Public Law - Judicial review: remedies revision notes (semester 2) R69,78   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Public Law - Judicial review: remedies revision notes (semester 2)

 16 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • January 14, 2024
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Judicial Review – remedies


JUDICIAL REVIEW – REMEDIES

5 remedies mentioned in S31 (1)

Prerogative orders under the common law, created by the courts

MANDATORY when the court tells the public authority to do something, you’ve
ORDER acted unlawfully so as result you must do…

PROHIBITING when the court tells a public authority they must NOT do
ORDER something


Statutory remedies created by parliament

QUASHING ORDER cancels a previous decision and leaves the public authority in a
position to make the decision again but lawfully

INJUNCTION court tells public authority to do or not do something

DECLARATION declares that something is unlawful, but no legal remedies will
follow



Remedies: their discretionary nature

“It will be for the court to decide whether to make any and, if so, what orders...”
Sir John Donaldson MR in Datafin

- All remedies are now purely discretionary – once the unlawfulness is established the
courts have discretion to do nothing or something from the remedies listed

R (Cowl) v Plymouth  Legitimate expectation of a care home to stay open
City Council [2001]  The claimant refused to go through the complaints process
with the council and just went straight to judicial review
 Court made it very clear that even if the legitimate
expectation succeeded and unlawfulness was established
they were not entitled to give any remedy at all as the case
came to court too soon

R (Hurley & Moore)  Business secretary power under challenge was to change
v Business Secretary the tuition fees regime for student finance
[2012]  Parliament have given the business secretary massive
power to reorganise higher education
 Challenged on illegality – public sector equality duty to pay
attention to inequality conditions

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaalunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R69,78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71498 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R69,78
  • (0)
  Buy now