Answers
Past Exam Paper answered in full
- Course
- Institution
- Book
Past examination paper answered in full
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Reform of Freehold Covenants Essay Plan
-
Fixtures / Chattels
-
The 1925 Property Legislation
Seller
Follow
1Caillou
Reviews received
Content preview
Question 7Sutherland was registered proprietor of a large house and garden. The house had a driveway at the
front (‘the driveway’) and a large garden at the back.
Three years ago, Sutherland converted the house into two, self-contained dwellings. He named them
North House and South House. Sutherland retained North House, the driveway, and the northern half
of the back garden. He sold South House, and the southern half of the back garden, to Tennyson. The
deed of transfer, which was signed by Sutherland and Tennyson, contains the following covenants:
‘Tennyson covenants on behalf of himself and the future owners of South House:
1. (1) not to construct any buildings in the garden of South House; and
2. (2) to contribute half of any costs incurred by the owner of North House in maintaining the
driveway.’
The deed of transfer also confers on Tennyson the right to park a car on the driveway, and contains a
clear description of North House, its garden, and the driveway. Tennyson was registered as proprietor
of South House and its garden. Sutherland entered notices of the burden of the covenants on the
Charges Register.
Two years ago, Sutherland sold North House, its garden and the driveway to Ursula, who was duly
registered as proprietor.
Last year, Tennyson sold South House and its garden to Victoria, who was registered as its proprietor.
Victoria has parked her car on the driveway since she purchased South House, and continues to do so.
Last week, Victoria started building a summerhouse in the garden of South House; and she is refusing
to contribute to costs recently incurred by Ursula in maintaining the driveway.
Advise the parties:
1. (i) whether Victoria is subject to the burden of covenant (1) in equity;
2. (ii) whether Ursula has acquired the benefit of covenant (1) in equity;
3. (iii) whether Victoria is subject to the burden of covenant (2) at common law;
4. (iv) whether Ursula has acquired the benefit of covenant (2) at common law; and
5. (v) what remedies are available to Ursula.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 1Caillou. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R151,80. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now