100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Past exam paper R151,80   Add to cart

Answers

Past exam paper

 83 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Past examination answered in full which includes questions on freehold covenants, easements and co-ownership

Preview 1 out of 13  pages

  • May 9, 2018
  • 13
  • 2017/2018
  • Answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Question 3

Two years ago, brothers James and Phil bought a registered freehold property called ‘Harlow House’
as a family home. James was married to Helen and had a 10 - year - old son called Barry. Phil was
married to Louise and had a 12 - year - old son called George. The transfer deed conveyed Harlow
House to James and Phil, who were registered as proprietors, to hold on trust for themselves and
Helen, Barry, Louise and George ‘as beneficial joint tenants.’

Just over a year ago, Helen mortgaged her interest in Harlow House to Andrew so that she could buy
Barry lots of presents for Christmas. The mortgage was in writing and signed by Helen.

Phil was an ambitious rugby player, and nine months ago he left Harlow House to pursue a rugby
career in Australia. Shortly after arriving in Australia, he wrote a letter to Louise saying he was
thinking of giving his share in Harlow House to their son, George. He signed the letter and sent it by
registered post to Harlow House.

Last month, Phil died in Australia after getting attacked b y a shark. His will left everything he owned
to the rugby club he played for.

Louise and George were devastated by Phil’s death, and want Harlow House to be sold so that they
can move to Australia and live where Phil was happiest. James and Helen want to remain in Harlow
House as Barry is thriving in the local school. The current value of Harlow House is £300,000, and the
outstanding debt on Helen’s mortgage is £3,000, though she has fallen behind with her repayments
recently.

Advise the parties:

(i) who were the legal and equitable co - owners of the house when it was acquired, and the
nature of their co - ownership at that time;

(ii) whether the events subsequent to acquisition affected the co - ownership of the house; and

(iii) whether Louise and George are likely to obtain a court order for an immediate sale of the
house.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 1Caillou. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R151,80. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R151,80
  • (0)
  Buy now