THIS DOCUMENT
CONTAINS ANSWERS
WORKINGS AND
SOLUTION TO THE
QUESTION BELOW
ADMIN
JIMMYCOSMAS
, Question 1
‘There is no hierarchy among the sources of customary international law listed in Article 38(1) of the ICJ
Statute. It is, in fact, nothing but an exercise in futility to attempt to justify a ranking of some sort among
these sources.’ To what extent does this statement represent the true nature of the provisions
contained in Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute? (10)
The statement suggests that there is no hierarchy among the sources of customary international law
listed in Article 38(1) of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Statute. However, the accuracy of this
assertion is subject to debate among legal scholars and practitioners.
Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute outlines the sources of international law that the Court shall apply. These
sources are:
1. International conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized
by the contesting states.
2. International custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law.
3. The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.
4. Judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of various nations as
subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.
While the provision does not explicitly establish a hierarchy among these sources, some argue that
certain sources may carry more weight or have greater authority in specific situations. For example,
treaties may prevail over customary law in case of a conflict. Additionally, the practice of states and
opinio juris, the belief that a certain practice is legally required, are essential elements for the formation
of customary international law.
In practice, the International Court of Justice and other international tribunals often consider these
sources in a holistic manner, weighing the specific circumstances of each case. Thus, asserting that it is
an "exercise in futility" to attempt to justify a ranking among these sources may oversimplify the
complex nature of international law and the way in which these sources interact.
In conclusion, while Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute does not explicitly establish a hierarchy, the relative
importance of each source can vary depending on the circumstances. The statement captures the idea
that these sources are interrelated, and their application depends on the specific facts and legal
arguments presented in a given case.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EstudyTube. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R47,91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.